Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography with Regard to the Further Therapy Regime and Patient Outcome-A Single-Center Experience in an Interdisciplinary Uroradiological Setting.
Marschner, Constantin A; Schwarze, Vincent; Stredele, Regina; Froelich, Matthias F; Rübenthaler, Johannes; Geyer, Thomas; Clevert, Dirk-André.
Afiliação
  • Marschner CA; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
  • Schwarze V; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
  • Stredele R; Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
  • Froelich MF; Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
  • Rübenthaler J; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
  • Geyer T; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
  • Clevert DA; Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(1)2021 Jan 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33435420
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) describes a common pediatric anomaly in pediatric urology with a prevalence of 1-2%. In diagnostics, in addition to the gold standard of voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), contrast-enhanced urosonography (ceVUS) offers a radiation-free procedure, which, despite its advantages, is not yet widely used. In the present single-center study, subsequent therapeutic procedures and outcomes after ceVUS of 49 patients were investigated. The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy of ceVUS with the intention of broader clinical implementation. Materials and

Methods:

Between 2016 and 2020, 49 patients were retrospectively included and received a ceVUS to evaluate VUR. With a distribution of 472 (95.9%), a clear female predominance was present. The age of the patients varied between 5 months and 60 years at the time of ceVUS. All examinations were all performed and subsequently interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (EFSUMB level 3).

Results:

Compared to intraoperative findings, ceVUS shows a sensitivity of 95.7% with a specificity of 100%. Allergic reactions to the contrast medium could not be observed.

Conclusion:

With its high sensitivity and intraoperative validation, ceVUS offers an excellent alternative to VCUG, the gold standard in the diagnosis of VUR. In addition, ceVUS is a radiation-free examination method with a low risk profile that offers an exceptional diagnostic tool in the diagnostic clarification of recurrent urinary tract infections with the suspected diagnosis of VUR and should also be included in the consideration of a diagnosis next to the established VCUG, especially in younger children.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Refluxo Vesicoureteral / Ultrassonografia / Meios de Contraste / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Refluxo Vesicoureteral / Ultrassonografia / Meios de Contraste / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article