Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The diagnostic accuracy of pre-hospital assessment of acute respiratory failure.
Fuller, Gordon W; Goodacre, Steve; Keating, Samuel; Herbert, Esther; Perkins, Gavin; Ward, Matthew; Rosser, Andy; Gunson, Imogen; Miller, Joshua; Bradburn, Mike; Harris, Tim; Cooper, Cindy.
Afiliação
  • Fuller GW; University of Sheffield: ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8532-3500.
  • Goodacre S; University of Sheffield.
  • Keating S; University of Sheffield.
  • Herbert E; University of Sheffield.
  • Perkins G; University of Warwick.
  • Ward M; West Midlands Ambulance Service.
  • Rosser A; West Midlands Ambulance Service.
  • Gunson I; West Midlands Ambulance Service.
  • Miller J; West Midlands Ambulance Service.
  • Bradburn M; University of Sheffield.
  • Harris T; Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry.
  • Cooper C; University of Sheffield.
Br Paramed J ; 5(3): 15-22, 2020 Dec 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33456393
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common medical emergency. Pre-hospital management includes controlled oxygen therapy, supplemented by specific management options directed at the underlying disease. The aim of the current study was to characterise the accuracy of paramedic diagnostic assessment in acute respiratory failure.

METHODS:

A nested diagnostic accuracy and agreement study comparing pre-hospital clinical impression to the final hospital discharge diagnosis was conducted as part of the ACUTE (Ambulance CPAP Use, Treatment effect and Economics) trial. Adults with suspected ARF were recruited from the UK West Midlands Ambulance Service. The pre-hospital clinical impression of the recruiting ambulance service clinician was prospectively recorded and compared to the final hospital diagnosis at 30 days. Agreement between pre-hospital and hospital diagnostic assessments was evaluated using raw agreement and Gwets AC1 coefficient.

RESULTS:

77 participants were included. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (32.9%) and lower respiratory tract infection (32.9%) were the most frequently suspected primary pre-hospital diagnoses for ARF, with secondary contributory conditions recorded in 36 patients (46.8%). There was moderate agreement between the primary pre-hospital and hospital diagnoses, with raw agreement of 58.5% and a Gwets AC1 coefficient of 0.56 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.69). In five cases, a non-respiratory final diagnosis was present, including myocardial infarction, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, liver failure and sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pre-hospital assessment of ARF is challenging, with limited accuracy compared to the final hospital diagnosis. A syndromic approach, providing general supportive care, rather than a specifically disease-orientated treatment strategy, is likely to be most appropriate for the pre-hospital environment.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article