A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Upper Airway Swab Collection for Detection of Viral and Bacterial Pathogens by Individuals or Caregivers Compared to Health Care Workers.
J Clin Microbiol
; 59(7): e0230420, 2021 06 18.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33468606
ABSTRACT
Self- or caregiver collection of upper airway swabs reduces infectious exposures of health care workers (HCWs) and the need to redeploy clinical staff to testing roles. We aimed to determine whether self- or caregiver collection has adequate diagnostic performance for detection of viral and bacterial upper airway pathogens. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing diagnostic accuracy of self- or caregiver-collected upper airway swabs collected by patients or caregivers compared to HCWs. All study types except case reports and series were included if sufficient data were presented to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's kappa. Studies published from 1946 to 17 August 2020 were included in the search. We did a meta-analysis to assess pooled sensitivity and specificity. Twenty studies were included in the systematic review and 15 in the meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity of swabs collected by patients or caregivers compared to HCWs was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87 to 94), and specificity was 98% (95% CI, 96 to 99). Sensitivity ranged from 65% to 100% and specificity from 73% to 100% across the studies. All but one study concluded that self- or caregiver-collected swabs were acceptable for detection of upper airway pathogens. Self- and caregiver collection of upper airway swabs had reassuring diagnostic performance for multiple pathogens. There are numerous potential benefits of self- and caregiver-collected swabs for patients, families, researchers, and health systems. Further research to optimize implementation of sample collection by patients and caregivers is warranted.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Manejo de Espécimes
/
Cuidadores
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2021
Tipo de documento:
Article