Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Role of the Environment in Overweight and Eating Behavior Variability: Insights from a Multivariate Twin Study.
Herle, Moritz; Madrid-Valero, Juan J; Morosoli, José J; Colodro-Conde, Lucía; Ordoñana, Juan.
Afiliação
  • Herle M; Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.
  • Madrid-Valero JJ; Department of Health Psychology, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
  • Morosoli JJ; Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Colodro-Conde L; Department of Human Anatomy and Psychobiology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
  • Ordoñana J; Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Twin Res Hum Genet ; 23(6): 338-344, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33480833
Research has emphasized the genetic basis of individual differences in body mass index (BMI); however, genetic factors cannot explain the rapid rise of obesity. Eating behaviors have been stipulated to be the behavioral expression of genetic risk in an obesogenic environment. In this study, we decompose variation and covariation between three key eating behaviors and BMI in a sample of 698 participants, consisting of 167 monozygotic, 150 dizygotic complete same-sex female twins and 64 incomplete pairs from a population-based twin registry in the southeast of Spain, The Murcia Twin Registry. Phenotypes were emotional eating, uncontrolled eating and cognitive restraint, measured by the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire and objectively measured BMI. Variation in eating behaviors was driven by nonshared environmental factors (range: 56%-65%), whereas shared environmental and genetic factors were secondary. All three eating behaviors were correlated with BMI (r = .19-.25). Nonshared environmental factors explained the covariations (Emotional eating-Uncontrolled eating: rE = .54, 95% CI [.43, .64]; BMI-Cognitive restraint: rE = .15, 95% CI [.01, .28]). In contrast to BMI, individual differences in eating behaviors are mostly explained by nonshared environmental factors, which also accounted for the phenotypic correlation between eating behaviors and BMI. Due to the sample size, analyses were underpowered to detect contributions of additive genetic or shared environmental factors to variation and covariation of the phenotypes. Although more research is granted, these results support that eating behaviors could be viable intervention targets to help individuals maintain a healthy weight.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Meio Ambiente / Sobrepeso / Comportamento Alimentar Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Meio Ambiente / Sobrepeso / Comportamento Alimentar Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article