Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ambient observations of sub-1.0 hygroscopic growth factor and f(RH) values: Case studies from surface and airborne measurements.
Ortega, Amber; Shingler, Taylor; Crosbie, Ewan; Wonaschütz, Anna; Froyd, Karl; Gao, Ru-Shan; Schwarz, Joshua; Perring, Anne; Beyersdorf, Andreas; Ziemba, Luke; Jimenez, Jose; Jost, Pedro Campuzano; Wisthaler, Armin; Russell, Lynn; Sorooshian, Armin.
Afiliação
  • Ortega A; Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  • Shingler T; Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
  • Crosbie E; NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA.
  • Wonaschütz A; University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Vienna, Austria.
  • Froyd K; NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Gao RS; NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Schwarz J; NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Perring A; NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Beyersdorf A; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Ziemba L; NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA.
  • Jimenez J; NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA.
  • Jost PC; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Wisthaler A; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Russell L; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • Sorooshian A; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
J Geophys Res Atmos ; 121(22): 661-677, 2016 Nov 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33489645
ABSTRACT
This study reports on the first set of ambient observations of sub-1.0 hygroscopicity values (i.e., growth factor, ratio of humidified-to-dry diameter, GF=D p,wet /D p,dry and f(RH), ratio of humidified-to-dry scattering coefficients, less than 1) with consistency across different instruments, regions, and platforms. We utilized data from (i) a shipboard humidified tandem differential mobility analyzer (HTDMA) during Eastern Pacific Emitted Aerosol Cloud Experiment (E-PEACE) in 2011, (ii) multiple instruments on the DC-8 aircraft during Studies of Emissions, Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC4RS) in 2013, as well as (iii) the Differential Aerosol Sizing and Hygroscopicity Spectrometer Probe (DASH-SP) during measurement intensives during Summer 2014 and Winter 2015 in Tucson, Arizona. Sub-1.0 GFs were observed across the range of relative humidity (RH) investigated (75-95%), and did not show a RH-dependent trend in value below 1.0 or frequency of occurrence. A commonality between suppressed hygroscopicity in these experiments, including sub-1.0 GF, was the presence of smoke. Evidence of externally mixed aerosol, and thus multiple GFs, was observed during smoke periods resulting in at least one mode with GF < 1. Time periods during which the DASH-SP detected externally mixed aerosol coincide with sub-1.0 f(RH) observations. Mechanisms responsible for sub-1.0 hygroscopicity are discussed and include refractive index (RI) modifications due to aqueous processing, particle restructuring, and volatilization effects. To further investigate ambient observations of sub-1.0 GFs, f(RH), and particle restructuring, modifying hygroscopicity instruments with pre-humidification modules is recommended.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article