Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers to Advancement in Academic Medicine: the Perception Gap Between Majority Men and Other Faculty.
Bateman, Lori Brand; Heider, Laura; Vickers, Selwyn M; Anderson, William A; Hood, Anthony C; Jones, Evelyn; Ott, Corilyn; Eady, Sequoya; Fouad, Mona N.
Afiliação
  • Bateman LB; School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. loribateman@uabmc.edu.
  • Heider L; Division of Preventive Medicine, UAB School of Medicine, 1717 11th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, USA. loribateman@uabmc.edu.
  • Vickers SM; Office for Diversity and Inclusion, Oschner Health, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
  • Anderson WA; School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Hood AC; School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Jones E; Collat School of Business, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Ott C; School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Eady S; School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Fouad MN; School of Nursing, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 36(7): 1937-1943, 2021 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33502686
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

According to the American Association of Medical Colleges, women comprise 26% of full professors and 19% of medical school department chairs. African American and Latino faculty comprise 4.6% of full professors and 6.9% of department chairs.

OBJECTIVE:

Because of the lack of representation of women and racial/ethnic minority faculty at the highest levels of academic medicine, this study examines the perceptions of barriers to advancement by men and women academic medical school faculty of differing races and ethnicities to explore potential differences in perceptions by demographic group.

DESIGN:

Semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted between July and September 2017.

PARTICIPANTS:

In order to give all faculty a chance to participate, faculty of all ranks and specialties were recruited from one southeastern medical school to participate in the study.

APPROACH:

Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by 3 members of the research team using an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Participants were organized into 4 groups for analysis-underrepresented in medicine (URiM) women, majority women, URiM men, majority men. KEY

RESULTS:

Sixty-four faculty consented to participate in the study (56.2% women, 34.4% URiM). Subthemes were grouped under three main themes Perceptions of Barriers to Advancement of Women Faculty, Perceptions of Barriers to Advancement of African American and Latino Faculty, and Perceptions of the Institutional Climate for Diversity. Majority men tended to voice distinctly different perspectives than the other three demographic groups, with the most notable differences between majority men and URiM women. Majority  men tended to suggest that the advancement of women and URiM faculty was acceptable or getting better, the lack of URiM faculty in leadership was due mainly to pipeline issues, and women choose not to advance to leadership positions.

CONCLUSION:

We found that participant gender and race/ethnicity shaped perspectives of medical school faculty advancement in distinct ways.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mobilidade Ocupacional / Etnicidade Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mobilidade Ocupacional / Etnicidade Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article