Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing Preventable Acute Care Use of Rural Versus Urban Americans: an Observational Study of National Rates During 2008-2017.
Johnston, Kenton J; Wen, Hefei; Kotwal, Ameya; Joynt Maddox, Karen E.
Afiliação
  • Johnston KJ; Department of Health Management and Policy and Center for Outcomes Research, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University , 3545 Lafayette Ave., Room 362, St. Louis, MO, 63104, USA. johnstonkj@slu.edu.
  • Wen H; Division of Health Policy and Insurance Research, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School & Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute , 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
  • Kotwal A; Department of Health Management and Policy, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University , 3545 Lafayette Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63104, USA.
  • Joynt Maddox KE; Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine , 660 S. Euclid Ave, CB 8086, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 36(12): 3728-3736, 2021 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33511571
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Rural Americans have less access to care than urban Americans. Preventable acute care use is a marker of unmet ambulatory healthcare needs, but little is known about how such utilization has differed between rural and urban areas over time.

OBJECTIVE:

Compare preventable emergency department (ED) visit and hospitalization rates among rural versus urban residents over the past decade.

DESIGN:

Observational study using a validated algorithm to compute age-sex-adjusted rates per 100,000 individuals of preventable ED visits and hospitalizations. Differences in overall, annual, and condition-specific rates for rural versus urban residents were assessed and linear regression was used to assess 10-year trends.

SETTING:

Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, National Inpatient Sample, and US Census, 2008-2017.

PARTICIPANTS:

US adults, an annual average of 241.3 million individuals. MEASUREMENTS Preventable ED visits and hospitalizations.

RESULTS:

Compared to urban residents, rural residents had 45% higher rates of preventable ED visits in 2008 (3003 vs. 2070 per 100,000, adjusted difference [AD] 933; 95% CI 928-938) and 44% higher rates of preventable ED visits in 2017 (3911 vs. 2708 per 100,000, AD 1202; 95% CI 1196-1208). Rural residents had 26% higher rates of preventable hospitalizations in 2008 (2104 vs. 1666 per 100,000, AD 439; 95% CI 434-443) and 13% higher rates in 2017 (1634 vs. 1440 per 100,000, AD 194; 95% CI 190-199). Preventable ED visits increased more in absolute terms in rural versus urban residents, but the percentage increase was similar (30% vs. 31%) because rural residents started at a higher baseline. Preventable hospitalizations decreased at a faster rate (22% vs. 14%) among rural versus urban residents.

LIMITATIONS:

Observational study; unable to infer causality.

CONCLUSIONS:

Rural disparities in acute care use are narrowing for preventable hospitalizations but have persisted for all preventable acute care use, suggesting unmet demand for high-quality ambulatory care in rural areas.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: População Rural / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: População Rural / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article