Risk comparison of beta-lactam-induced anaphylaxis: Therapeutic stratification analysis in a Vietnamese pharmacovigilance database.
J Clin Pharm Ther
; 46(4): 950-956, 2021 Aug.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33565097
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: There is limited data on the specific risks of anaphylaxis induced by beta-lactam drugs. The aim of this study was to compare the risks of reporting beta-lactam-induced anaphylaxis using the national pharmacovigilance database of Vietnam (NPDV). METHODS: The multivariate generalised linear regression model was applied for signal generation and comparison of beta-lactams. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2016, there were 2,921 reports of anaphylaxis (19.93%) from 14,655 spontaneous reports of beta-lactam use in the NDPV. Anaphylaxis signal generation was also found for the subgroup J01D (cephalosporins and carbapenems) (ROR = 1.27 [1.16-1.39]) and beta-lactamase-sensitive penicillins (ROR = 1.74 [1.27-2.35]). In the third generation cephalosporin subgroup, different risks were identified for the following combinations of beta-lactams: 1) cefotaxime with cefoperazone+sulbactam; 2) cefixime/cefpodoxime/cefdinir with cefoperazone+sulbactam or ceftizoxime/cefoperazone/ceftazidime/ceftriaxone/cefotaxime. For the second generation cephalosporin subgroup, different risks were found for cefotiam compared to cefmetazole, cefaclor, cefamandole and cefuroxime. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: These findings identified and highlighted the different anaphylactic risks caused by various beta-lactams in the main subgroups.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Povo Asiático
/
Beta-Lactamas
/
Anafilaxia
/
Antibacterianos
Tipo de estudo:
Etiology_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Humans
País como assunto:
Asia
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2021
Tipo de documento:
Article