Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of acrylamide-removing properties of bacterial consortia under simulated gastrointestinal conditions.
Torres-Gregorio, Margarita; Santiago-López, Lourdes; Vallejo-Cordoba, Belinda; González-Córdova, Aarón F; Garcia, Hugo Sergio; Hernandez-Mendoza, Adrián.
Afiliação
  • Torres-Gregorio M; Unidad de Investigación y Desarrollo en Alimentos (UNIDA), Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz, Veracruz, Mexico.
  • Santiago-López L; Laboratorio de Química y Biotecnología de Productos Lácteos, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A. C., Hermosillo, Mexico.
  • Vallejo-Cordoba B; Laboratorio de Química y Biotecnología de Productos Lácteos, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A. C., Hermosillo, Mexico.
  • González-Córdova AF; Laboratorio de Química y Biotecnología de Productos Lácteos, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A. C., Hermosillo, Mexico.
  • Garcia HS; Unidad de Investigación y Desarrollo en Alimentos (UNIDA), Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz, Veracruz, Mexico.
  • Hernandez-Mendoza A; Laboratorio de Química y Biotecnología de Productos Lácteos, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A. C., Hermosillo, Mexico.
J Sci Food Agric ; 101(12): 5049-5055, 2021 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33570782
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Previous studies have demonstrated the acrylamide-removing properties of probiotic monocultures; however, potential advantages of consortia over monocultures in reducing the dietary exposure to acrylamide have not been proven. Hence this work aims to assess the acrylamide (AA)-binding properties of bacterial consortia, consisting of either probiotic strains and / or representative bacteria of duodenal microbiota, exposed to simulated gastrointestinal conditions (SGC). The AA binding capacity of ten probiotic strains (PS) and six duodenal strains (NDS) was evaluated under different conditions; then, three different consortia (PS, NDS, and PS + NDS) were assessed under SGC.

RESULTS:

Among individual PS, Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, Lactobacillus fermentum J23, L. pentosus J37 and J24, and L. casei Shirota, exhibited the highest AA-binding capacity (80-87%), while Bifidobacterium catenulatun ATCC27676, Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus ATCC19258, and S. gallolyticus ATCC9809 were the best (ca. 68%) NDS monocultures. Probiotic strain consortia showed higher (P < 0.05) AA binding capacity (> 90%) than monoculture bacteria. Conversely, individual NDS cultures displayed higher (P < 0.05) binding capacity than NDS consortia (60%). A significant reduction (P < 0.05) in AA removal capacity was observed when consortia were exposed to SGC, PS consortia being the most effective (> 60% removal).

CONCLUSION:

These results suggest that consortia of specific PS could play an important role in reducing the intestinal availability of acrylamide. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Probióticos / Acrilamida / Trato Gastrointestinal / Microbioma Gastrointestinal / Lactobacillus Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Probióticos / Acrilamida / Trato Gastrointestinal / Microbioma Gastrointestinal / Lactobacillus Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article