Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data.
Gomes, Eduardo; Bertini, Luciano; Campos, Wagner Rangel; Sobral, Ana Paula; Mocaiber, Izabela; Copetti, Alessandro.
Afiliação
  • Gomes E; Computer Science Departament, Fluminense Federal University, Rio das Ostras 28895-532, Brazil.
  • Bertini L; Computer Science Departament, Fluminense Federal University, Rio das Ostras 28895-532, Brazil.
  • Campos WR; Computer Science Departament, Fluminense Federal University, Rio das Ostras 28895-532, Brazil.
  • Sobral AP; Production Engineering Departament, Fluminense Federal University, Rio das Ostras 28895-532, Brazil.
  • Mocaiber I; Natural Sciences Departament, Fluminense Federal University, Rio das Ostras 28895-532, Brazil.
  • Copetti A; Computer Science Departament, Fluminense Federal University, Rio das Ostras 28895-532, Brazil.
Sensors (Basel) ; 21(4)2021 Feb 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33572249
ABSTRACT
In pervasive healthcare monitoring, activity recognition is critical information for adequate management of the patient. Despite the great number of studies on this topic, a contextually relevant parameter that has received less attention is intensity recognition. In the present study, we investigated the potential advantage of coupling activity and intensity, namely, Activity-Intensity, in accelerometer data to improve the description of daily activities of individuals. We further tested two alternatives for supervised classification. In the first alternative, the activity and intensity are inferred together by applying a single classifier algorithm. In the other alternative, the activity and intensity are classified separately. In both cases, the algorithms used for classification are k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF). The results showed the viability of the classification with good accuracy for Activity-Intensity recognition. The best approach was KNN implemented in the single classifier alternative, which resulted in 79% of accuracy. Using two classifiers, the result was 97% accuracy for activity recognition (Random Forest), and 80% for intensity recognition (KNN), which resulted in 78% for activity-intensity coupled. These findings have potential applications to improve the contextualized evaluation of movement by health professionals in the form of a decision system with expert rules.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Acelerometria / Aprendizado de Máquina Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Acelerometria / Aprendizado de Máquina Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article