Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the cost and quality-of-life impact of on-demand-only medications for adults with hereditary angioedema.
Castaldo, Anthony J; Jervelund, Christian; Corcoran, Deborah; Boysen, Henrik B; Christiansen, Sandra C; Zuraw, Bruce L.
Afiliação
  • Castaldo AJ; From the US Hereditary Angioedema Association, Fairfax, Virginia.
  • Jervelund C; Copenhagen Economics, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Corcoran D; Hereditary Angioedema International, Fairfax, Virginia; and.
  • Boysen HB; Hereditary Angioedema International, Fairfax, Virginia; and.
  • Christiansen SC; Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Zuraw BL; Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 42(2): 108-117, 2021 03 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33581742
Background: Novel subcutaneous (SC) prophylactic therapies are transforming the treatment landscape of hereditary angioedema (HAE). Although questions are being raised about their cost, little attention has been paid to the cost and quality of life (QoL) impact of using on-demand-only medications. Objective: We assessed the overall economic burden of on-demand-only treatment for HAE and compared patient QoL with patients who received novel SC prophylactic therapies. Methods: US Hereditary Angioedema Association members were invited to complete an anonymous online survey to profile attack frequency, treatment use, and the presence of comorbidities as well as economic and socioeconomic variables. We modeled on-demand treatment costs by using net pricing of medications in 2018, indirect patient and caregiver costs, and attack-related direct billed costs for emergency department admissions, physician office visits, and/or hospitalizations. QoL was assessed by using the Angioedema Quality of Life questionnaire. Results: A total of 1225 patients (31.4%) responded. Of these, 737 adults with HAE (type I or II) met the inclusion criteria and completed the survey. Per patient/year direct costs associated with modeled on-demand-only treatment totaled $363,795, with additional indirect socioeconomic costs of $52,576 per patient/year. The greatest improvement in QoL was seen in patients who used novel SC prophylactic therapies, with a 59.5% (p < 0.01) improvement in median impairment scores versus on-demand-only treatment. In addition, patients who used novel SC prophylactic therapies reported a 77% reduction in the number of attacks each year when compared with those who used on-demand-only treatment. Conclusion: Our real-world patient data showed the cost and QoL burden of HAE treatment with on-demand-only therapy. Use of novel SC prophylaxis can lead to sizeable reductions in attack frequency and statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in QoL. These data could be useful to clinicians and patients as they consider therapy options for patients with HAE.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides / Custos de Medicamentos / Quimioprevenção / Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1 / Angioedemas Hereditários Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged80 País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides / Custos de Medicamentos / Quimioprevenção / Proteína Inibidora do Complemento C1 / Angioedemas Hereditários Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged80 País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article