Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of noise on the electrocardiographic parameters.
Tascanov, Mustafa Begenc; Havlioglu, Suzan; Tanriverdi, Zulkif; Gungoren, Fatih; Altiparmak, Ibrahim Halil.
Afiliação
  • Tascanov MB; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey. drbegenc@gmail.com.
  • Havlioglu S; Health Services Vocational School, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
  • Tanriverdi Z; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
  • Gungoren F; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
  • Altiparmak IH; Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 94(6): 1397-1403, 2021 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33646333
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Noise, defined as any sound that is unpleasant, is one of the most important environmental problems. Prolonged exposure to noise has been shown to be associated with the development of cardiovascular diseases. No study investigated the effect of noise on surface electrocardiography (ECG).

AIMS:

The aim of our study is to investigate the effect of noise on surface ECG parameters including P-wave dispersion (PWD), QT intervals, corrected QT interval (QTc), T-wave peak to end (Tp-e) interval, and Tp-e/QT and Tp-e/QTc ratios.

METHODS:

A total of 51 people working in the textile factory affected by the noise and 43 volunteers without any disease and who were not exposed to noise were included in this study. The average noise level in the textile factory was 112 dB. A 12-lead ECG was obtained from all individuals. PR interval, PWD, QRS duration, QT interval, QTc interval, Tp-e interval, and Tp-e/QT and Tp-e/QTc ratios were calculated for all individuals.

RESULTS:

The noise group had significantly increased PWD [35 (28-40) vs. 28 (22-36) p = 0.029], QT interval ( 373.5 ± 27.3 vs. 359.3 ± 2.74, p = 0.001), QTc interval [(409 ± 21 vs. 403 ± 13 p = 0.045)], Tp-e interval [(90.6 ± 6.0 vs. 83.5 ± 7.3 p < 0.001)], Tp-e/QT [(0.24 ± 0.03 vs. 0.23 ± 0.02, p = 0.015)] and Tp-e/QTc [(0.22 ± 0.02 vs. 0.21 ± 0.02 p < 0.001)] compared to control group. Also, duration of working was positively correlated with PWD (r = 0.468, p = 0.001) and Tp-e/QTc ratio (r = 0.328, p = 0.019). In multiple linear regression linear regression analysis, noise was the independent predictor of both PWD (ß = 0.244, p = 0.032) and Tp-e/QTc (ß = 0.319, p = 0.003)

CONCLUSION:

We showed that noise significantly increased PWD, QT and Tp-e interval measurements. Also, noise was the independent predictor for both PWD and Tp-e/QTc.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletrocardiografia / Ruído Ocupacional Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletrocardiografia / Ruído Ocupacional Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article