Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experience with netarsudil 0.02% and latanoprostene bunod 0.024% as adjunctive therapy for glaucoma.
Mehta, Amy A; Kanu, Levi N; Sood-Mendiratta, Shalini; Quinones, Richard; Hawkins, Anjali; Lehrer, Richard A; Malhotra, Kiran; Papas, Robert; Hillman, David; Wilensky, Jacob T; Aref, Ahmad A; Vajaranant, Thasarat Sutabutr; Edward, Deepak P.
Afiliação
  • Mehta AA; Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Kanu LN; Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Sood-Mendiratta S; Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Quinones R; Cleveland Clinic, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Hawkins A; Arbor Centers for Eyecare, Homewood, IL, USA.
  • Lehrer RA; Geneva Eye Clinic, Geneva, IL, USA.
  • Malhotra K; Ohio Eye Alliance, Alliance, OH, USA.
  • Papas R; Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Hillman D; Ohio Eye Alliance, Alliance, OH, USA.
  • Wilensky JT; Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Aref AA; Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Vajaranant TS; Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Edward DP; Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 32(1): 322-326, 2022 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33653172
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess the effectiveness and safety of adjunctive topical netarsudil 0.02% and latanoprostene bunod 0.024% in patients with glaucoma.

METHODS:

A retrospective, multi-center, cohort study of patients with glaucoma treated with netarsudil 0.02% or latanoprostene bunod from five tertiary care centers. Inclusion criteria included patients with glaucoma treated with either medication as adjunctive therapy. Outcomes included mean absolute intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and relative IOP reduction from baseline. Adverse reactions and reasons for discontinuation were reported. One-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, and Mann Whitney U test compared the outcomes.

RESULTS:

A total of 95 eyes (95 patients) on netarsudil and 41 eyes (41 patients) on latanoprostene bunod were analyzed. Mean duration of use was 54.3 ± 28 days for netarsudil and 82.9 ± 51.2 days for latanoprostene bunod. At the final visit, mean IOP reduction was 3.9 ± 4.6 mmHg (17.5 ± 6.0%) (p < 0.0001) with netarsudil and 2.9 ± 3.7 mmHg (13.6 ± 16.3%) (p < 0.0001) with latanoprostene bunod. IOP lowering did not depend on baseline number of IOP-lowering medications. The most common reason for discontinuation was non-effectiveness in both groups.

CONCLUSION:

Similar to monotherapy, netarsudil and latanoprostene bunod demonstrated efficacy in lowering IOP when used as adjunctive therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glaucoma / Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto / Hipertensão Ocular Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glaucoma / Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto / Hipertensão Ocular Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article