Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Developing implementation strategies to adopt Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) guidelines.
Lam, Jennifer Y; Howlett, Alexandra; McLuckie, Duncan; Stephen, Lori M; Else, Scott D N; Jones, Ashley; Beaudry, Paul; Brindle, Mary E.
Afiliação
  • Lam JY; Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Howlett A; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Western University, Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • McLuckie D; Department of Pediatrics, Section of Neonatology, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Stephen LM; Department of Anesthesia, Section of Pediatric Anesthesia, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Else SDN; Department of Pediatrics, Section of Neonatology, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Jones A; Department of Anesthesia, Section of Pediatric Anesthesia, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Beaudry P; Patient and Family Advisor, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Brindle ME; Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BJS Open ; 5(2)2021 03 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33688958
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Strong implementation strategies are critical to the success of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) guidelines, though little documentation exists on effective strategies, especially in complex clinical situations and unfamiliar contexts. This study outlines the process taken to adopt a novel neonatal ERAS® guideline.

METHODS:

The implementation strategy was approached in a multi-pronged, concurrent but asynchronous fashion. Between September 2019 and January 2020, healthcare providers from various disciplines and different specialties as well as parents participated in the strategy. Multidisciplinary teams were created to consider existing literature and local contexts including potential facilitators and/or barriers. Task forces worked collaboratively to develop new care pathways. An audit system was developed to record outcomes and elicit feedback for revision.

RESULTS:

32 healthcare providers representing 9 disciplines and 5 specialties as well as 8 parents participated. Care pathways and resources were created. Elements recommended for a successful implementation strategy included identification of champions, multidisciplinary stakeholder involvement, consideration of local contexts and insights, patient/family engagement, education, and creation of an audit system.

CONCLUSION:

A multidisciplinary and structured process following principles of implementation science was used to develop an effective implementation strategy for initiating ERAS® guidelines.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Procedimentos Clínicos / Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Procedimentos Clínicos / Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article