Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Renal denervation for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Prado, Gabriela M; Mahfoud, Felix; Lopes, Renato D; Moreira, Dalmo A R; Staico, Rodolfo; Damiani, Lucas P; Ukena, Christian; Armaganijan, Luciana V.
Afiliação
  • Prado GM; Electrophysiology and Cardiac Arrhythmias Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Mahfoud F; Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
  • Lopes RD; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Moreira DAR; Electrophysiology and Cardiac Arrhythmias Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Staico R; Electrophysiology and Cardiac Arrhythmias Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Damiani LP; HCor Research Institute, Hospital do Coração (HCor), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Ukena C; Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
  • Armaganijan LV; Electrophysiology and Cardiac Arrhythmias Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 32(5): 1430-1439, 2021 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33724602
INTRODUCTION: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with heart disease. Recent studies evaluated the effect of renal denervation (RDN) on the occurrence of VAs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of this procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify studies that evaluated the use of RDN for the management of VAs. Primary outcomes were reduction in the number of VAs and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Secondary outcomes were changes in blood pressure and renal function. Ten studies (152 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. RDN was associated with a reduction in the number of VAs, antitachycardia pacing, ICD shocks, and overall ICD therapies of 3.53 events/patient/month (95% confidence interval [CI] = -5.48 to -1.57), 2.86 events/patient/month (95% CI = -4.09 to -1.63), 2.04 events/patient/month (95% CI = -2.12 to -1.97), and 2.68 events/patient/month (95% CI = -3.58 to -1.78), respectively. Periprocedural adverse events occurred in 1.23% of patients and no significant changes were seen in blood pressure or renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with refractory VAs, RDN was associated with a reduction in the number of VAs and ICD therapies, and was shown to be a safe procedure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Taquicardia Ventricular / Desfibriladores Implantáveis Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Taquicardia Ventricular / Desfibriladores Implantáveis Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article