Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Should methyldibromo glutaronitrile continue to be used in the European baseline Series? A REIDAC national cross-sectional study.
Mercader-García, Pedro; Pastor-Nieto, María Antonia; Gonzalez-Perez, Ricardo; Cordoba-Guijarro, Susana; Gimenez-Arnau, Ana María; Ruiz-Gonzalez, Inmaculada; Mora-Fernández, Verónica; Miquel, Javier; Silvestre-Salvador, Juan Francisco; Ortiz-Frutos, Francisco Javier; Sanz-Sanchez, Tatiana; Rodriguez-Serna, Mercedes; Perez-Feal, Patricia; Sánchez-Pérez, Javier; Heras-Mendaza, Felipe; Serra-Baldrich, Ester; Zaragoza-Ninet, Violeta; Hervella-Garces, Marcos; Gatica-Ortega, María Elena; García-Doval, Ignacio; Descalzo, Miguel Ángel; Borrego, Leopoldo.
Afiliação
  • Mercader-García P; Deparment of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario Jose Mª Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
  • Pastor-Nieto MA; Department of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain.
  • Gonzalez-Perez R; Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario Araba, Vitoria, Spain.
  • Cordoba-Guijarro S; Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain.
  • Gimenez-Arnau AM; Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar. IMAS, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Ruiz-Gonzalez I; Department of Dermatology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, Leon, Spain.
  • Mora-Fernández V; Department of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitari German Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Miquel J; Department of Dermatology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain.
  • Silvestre-Salvador JF; Department of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario, Alicante, Spain.
  • Ortiz-Frutos FJ; Department of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario 12 de octubre, Madrid, Spain.
  • Sanz-Sanchez T; Department of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario Infanta Sofia, Madrid, Spain.
  • Rodriguez-Serna M; Department of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Perez-Feal P; Department of Dermatology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Sánchez-Pérez J; Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
  • Heras-Mendaza F; Department of Dermatology, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Serra-Baldrich E; Department of Dermatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Zaragoza-Ninet V; Department of Dermatology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  • Hervella-Garces M; Department of Dermatology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Gatica-Ortega ME; Department of Dermatology, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
  • García-Doval I; Research Unit, Fundación Piel Sana Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología, Madrid, Spain.
  • Descalzo MÁ; Research Unit, Fundación Piel Sana Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología, Madrid, Spain.
  • Borrego L; Department of Dermatology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil. Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Contact Dermatitis ; 85(5): 572-577, 2021 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33745152
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) was one of the most frequent and relevant allergens found in patch testing at the beginning of this century. In 2008, this preservative was banned from cosmetics in Europe and ever since the prevalence of contact allergy to MDBGN has progressively decreased. Despite that gradual decline, MDBGN is still patch-tested in most baseline series. This study assessed the frequency of MDBGN sensitization, epidemiological characteristics of allergic patients, and the relevance of positive patch tests in a nationwide Spanish registry (REIDAC). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

We evaluated consecutively patch-tested patients in all participating centres. Using these data, we calculated the proportion of patients with positive patch tests to MDBGN from June 2018 to June 2020 and evaluated the relevance of the positive patch tests.

RESULTS:

One hundred and fourteen out of 5072 (2.24 %) tested patients were sensitized to MDBGN. Clinical current relevance was confirmed in only one case.

CONCLUSION:

Although the frequency of contact allergy to MDBGN remains high, no clinical significance was found in most of these patients (5072 tests needed to obtain one relevant positive result). The clinical usefulness of this allergen seems weak and its continued inclusion in the European baseline series is questionable.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conservantes Farmacêuticos / Dermatite Alérgica de Contato / Cosméticos / Nitrilas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conservantes Farmacêuticos / Dermatite Alérgica de Contato / Cosméticos / Nitrilas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article