Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A critical review on geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol in water: sources, effects, detection, and removal techniques.
Mustapha, S; Tijani, J O; Ndamitso, M M; Abdulkareem, A S; Shuaib, D T; Mohammed, A K.
Afiliação
  • Mustapha S; Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Technology, Bosso Campus, PMB 65, Minna, Nigeria. saheedmustapha09@gmail.com.
  • Tijani JO; Nanotechnology Research Group, Africa Center of Excellence for Mycotoxin and Food Safety, Federal University of Technology, PMB 65, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria. saheedmustapha09@gmail.com.
  • Ndamitso MM; Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Technology, Bosso Campus, PMB 65, Minna, Nigeria.
  • Abdulkareem AS; Nanotechnology Research Group, Africa Center of Excellence for Mycotoxin and Food Safety, Federal University of Technology, PMB 65, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria.
  • Shuaib DT; Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Technology, Bosso Campus, PMB 65, Minna, Nigeria.
  • Mohammed AK; Nanotechnology Research Group, Africa Center of Excellence for Mycotoxin and Food Safety, Federal University of Technology, PMB 65, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria.
Environ Monit Assess ; 193(4): 204, 2021 Mar 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33751262
The exposure to geosmin (GSM) and 2-methylisoborneol (2-MIB) in water has caused a negative impact on product reputation and customer distrust. The occurrence of these compounds and their metabolites during drinking water treatment processes has caused different health challenges. Conventional treatment techniques such as coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and chlorination employed in removing these two commonest taste and odor compounds (GSM and 2-MIB) were found to be ineffective and inherent shortcomings. The removal of GSM and MIB were found to be effective using combination of activated carbon and ozonation; however, high treatment cost associated with ozonation technique and poor regeneration efficiency of activated carbon constitute serious setback to the combined system. Other shortcoming of the activated carbon adsorption and ozonation include low adsorption efficiency due to the presence of natural organic matter and humic acid. In light of this background, the review is focused on the sources, effects, environmental pathways, detection, and removal techniques of 2-MIB and GSM from aqueous media. Although advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) were found to be promising to remove the two compounds from water but accompanied with different challenges. Herein, to fill the knowledge gap analysis on these algal metabolites (GSM and 2-MIB), the integration of treatment processes vis-a-viz combination of one or more AOPs with other conventional methods are considered logical to remove these odorous compounds and hence could improve overall water quality.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes Químicos da Água / Purificação da Água Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes Químicos da Água / Purificação da Água Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article