Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
HeartWare HVAD Flow Estimator Accuracy for Left and Right Ventricular Support.
Stephens, Andrew F; Mapley, Martin; Wu, Eric L; Fraser, John F; Steinseifer, Ulrich; Bartnikowski, Nicole; Gregory, Shaun D.
Afiliação
  • Stephens AF; From the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Mapley M; Cardiorespiratory Engineering and Technology Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Wu EL; School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Fraser JF; Innovative Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Laboratory, Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.
  • Steinseifer U; Innovative Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Laboratory, Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.
  • Bartnikowski N; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Gregory SD; Innovative Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Laboratory, Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.
ASAIO J ; 67(4): 416-422, 2021 04 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33769996
ABSTRACT
This study investigated the accuracy of the HeartWare HVAD flow estimator for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and biventricular assist device (BiVAD) support for modes of reduced speed (BiVAD-RS) and banded outflow (BiVAD-B). The HVAD flow estimator was evaluated in a mock circulatory loop under changes in systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance, heart rate, central venous pressure, and simulated hematocrit (correlated to viscosity). A difference was found between mean estimated and mean measured flow for LVAD (0.1 ± 0.3 L/min), BiVAD-RS (-0.1 ± 0.2 L/min), and BiVAD-B (0 ± 0.2 L/min). Analysis of the flow waveform pulsatility showed good correlation for LVAD (r2 = 0.98) with a modest spread in error (0.7 ± 0.1 L/min), while BiVAD-RS and BiVAD-B showed similar spread in error (0.7 ± 0.3 and 0.7 ± 0.2 L/min, respectively), with much lower correlation (r2 = 0.85 and r2 = 0.60, respectively). This study demonstrated that the mean flow error of the HVAD flow estimator is similar when the device is used in LVAD, BiVAD-RS, or BiVAD-B configuration. However, the instantaneous flow waveform should be interpreted with caution, particularly in the cases of BiVAD support.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coração Auxiliar / Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda / Hemodinâmica / Modelos Cardiovasculares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coração Auxiliar / Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda / Hemodinâmica / Modelos Cardiovasculares Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article