Assessment of myocardial deformation with CMR: a comparison with ultrasound speckle tracking.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Myocardial deformation integrated with cardiac dimensions provides a comprehensive assessment of cardiac function, which has proven useful to differentiate cardiac pathology from physiological adaptation to situations such as chronic intensive training. Feature tracking (FT) can measure myocardial deformation from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine sequences; however, its accuracy is not yet fully validated. Our aim was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of FT with speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in highly trained endurance athletes. METHODS: Ninety-three endurance athletes (> 12-h training/week during the last 5 years, 52% male, 35 ± 5.1 years old) and 72 age-matched controls underwent resting CMR and transthoracic echocardiography to assess biventricular exercise-induced remodeling and biventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) by CMR-FT and STE. RESULTS: Strain values were significantly lower when assessed by CMR-FT compared to STE (p < 0.001), with good reproducibility for the left ventricle (bias = 3.94%, limit of agreement [LOA] = ± 4.27 %) but wider variability for right ventricle strain. Strain values by both techniques proportionally decreased with increasing ventricular volumes, potentially depicting the functional biventricular reserve that characterizes athletes' hearts. CONCLUSIONS: Biventricular longitudinal strain values were lower when assessed by FT as compared to STE. Both methods were statistically comparable when measuring LV strain but not RV strain. These differences might be justified by the lower in-plane spatial and temporal resolution of FT, which is particularly relevant for the complex anatomy of the RV. KEY POINTS • Strain values were significantly lower when assessed by FT as compared to STE, which was expected due to the lower in-plane spatial and temporal resolution of FT versus STE. • Both methods were statistically comparable when measuring LV strain but not for RV strain analysis. • Characterizing the normal ranges and reproducibility of strain metrics by FT is an important step toward its clinical applicability, since it can be assessed offline and applied to routinely acquired cine CMR images.