Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of different thermal insulation methods on the nasopharyngeal temperature in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Yang, Guanyu; Zhu, Zefei; Zheng, Hongyu; He, Shifeng; Zhang, Wanyue; Sun, Zhentao.
Afiliação
  • Yang G; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
  • Zhu Z; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
  • Zheng H; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
  • He S; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
  • Zhang W; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
  • Sun Z; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China. gentlesun@126.com.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 21(1): 101, 2021 04 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33820541
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study explored the comparison of the thermal insulation effect of incubator to infusion thermometer in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

METHODS:

We assigned 75 patients enrolled in the study randomly to three groups Group A Used warming blanket; group B Used warming blanket and infusion thermometer; group C Used warming blanket and incubator. The nasopharyngeal temperature at different time points during the operation served as the primary outcome.

RESULTS:

The nasopharyngeal temperature of the infusion heating group was significantly higher than that of the incubator group 60 min from the beginning of surgery (T3) 36.10 ± 0.20 vs 35.81 ± 0.20 (P<0.001)90 min from the beginning of surgery (T4) 36.35 ± 0.20 vs 35.85 ± 0.17 (P<0.001). Besides, the nasopharyngeal temperature of the incubator group was significantly higher compared to that of the control group 60 min from the beginning of surgery (T3) 35.81 ± 0.20 vs 35.62 ± 0.18 (P<0.001); 90 min from the beginning of surgery (T4) 35.85 ± 0.17 vs 35.60 ± 0.17 (P<0.001). Regarding the wake-up time, that of the control group was significantly higher compared to the infusion heating group 24 ± 4 vs 21 ± 4 (P = 0.004) and the incubator group 24 ± 4 vs 22 ± 4 (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION:

Warming blanket (38 °C) combined infusion thermometer (37 °C) provides better perioperative thermal insulation. Hospitals without an infusion thermometer can opt for an incubator as a substitute. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was registered with ChiCTR2000039162 , 20 October 2020.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Temperatura Corporal / Nasofaringe / Calefação / Hipotermia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Temperatura Corporal / Nasofaringe / Calefação / Hipotermia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article