Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer with 18F-DCFPyL PET/multiparametric MR.
Metser, Ur; Ortega, Claudia; Perlis, Nathan; Lechtman, Eli; Berlin, Alejandro; Anconina, Reut; Eshet, Yael; Chan, Rosanna; Veit-Haibach, Patrick; van der Kwast, Theodorus H; Liu, Amy; Ghai, Sangeet.
Afiliação
  • Metser U; Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada. Ur.metser@uhn.ca.
  • Ortega C; Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
  • Perlis N; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Lechtman E; Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
  • Berlin A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network & University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Anconina R; Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
  • Eshet Y; Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
  • Chan R; Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
  • Veit-Haibach P; Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
  • van der Kwast TH; Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Liu A; Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Ghai S; Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 48(11): 3702-3711, 2021 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33846845
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess whether 18F-DCFPyL PET/multiparametric (mp)MR contributes to the diagnosis of clinically significant (cs) prostate cancer (PCa) compared to mpMR in patients with suspicion of PCa, or patients being considered for focal ablative therapies (FT). PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

This ethics review board-approved, prospective study included 55 men with suspicion of PCa and negative systematic biopsies or clinically discordant low-risk PCa (n = 21) or those being considered for FT (n = 34) who received 18F-DCFPyL PET/mpMR. Each modality, PET, mpMR, and PET/MR (using the PROMISE classification), was assessed independently. All suspicious lesions underwent PET/MR-ultrasound fusion biopsies.

RESULTS:

There were 45/55 patients (81.8%) that had histologically proven PCa and 41/55 (74.5%) were diagnosed with csPCa. Overall, 61/114 lesions (53.5%) identified on any modality were malignant; 49/61 lesions (80.3%) were csPCa. On lesion-level analysis, for detection of csPCa, the sensitivity of PET was higher than that of mpMR and PET/MR (86% vs 67% and 69% [p = 0.027 and 0.041, respectively]), but at a lower specificity (32% vs 85% and 86%, respectively [p < 0.001]). The performance of MR and PET/MR was comparable. For identification of csPCa in PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions, the AUC (95% CI) for PET, mpMR, and PET/MR was 0.75 (0.65-0.86), 0.69 (0.56-0.82), and 0.78 (0.67-0.89), respectively. The AUC for PET/MR was significantly larger than that of mpMR (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION:

PSMA PET detects more csPCa than mpMR, but at low specificity. The performance PET/MR is better than mpMR for detection of csPCa in PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NCT03149861.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article