A randomized controlled trial of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging system on duration of surgery and mental workload for laparoscopic gastropexies in dogs.
Vet Surg
; 50(5): 944-953, 2021 Jul.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33864647
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the effect of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy compared to two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy when evaluating duration of surgery for canine intracorporeally sutured gastropexy. STUDYDESIGN:
Randomized controlled clinical trial. ANIMALS Thirty client-owned dogs.METHODS:
Dogs were randomized into 2D or 3D groups and underwent a three-port laparoscopic intracorporeally sutured incisional gastropexy with barbed suture. Procedures were performed by a single board-certified surgeon. Duration of surgery was recorded and workload was assessed immediately after surgery using the NASA Task Load Index (TLX).RESULTS:
Median duration of surgery was 3 min shorter for 3D versus 2D (95%CI -10 to 13; p = .51). Surgical component durations, total and component TLX scores, and intraoperative complications also did not differ between groups. In a subgroup analysis excluding the first eight cases due to presumption of a learning curve with suturing technique, total TLX score (p = .004) and all component scores were lower for 3D as compared to 2D laparoscopy, although duration of surgery did not differ (p = .20).CONCLUSION:
The use of 3D laparoscopy was not associated with shorter duration of surgery when compared to 2D laparoscopy. CLINICALSIGNIFICANCE:
3D laparoscopy requires further investigation in veterinary medicine to determine its utility in decreasing surgical duration, surgical complications or surgeon mental or physical workload.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Laparoscopia
/
Imageamento Tridimensional
/
Doenças do Cão
/
Gastropexia
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
Limite:
Animals
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2021
Tipo de documento:
Article