Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Using Negative Pressure Massage: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Lampinen, Riikka; Lee, Jeannette Q; Leano, Janella; Miaskowski, Christine; Mastick, Judy; Brinker, Lisa; Topp, Kimberly; Smoot, Betty.
Afiliação
  • Lampinen R; Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, University of California San Francisco/San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.
  • Lee JQ; Department of Physical Therapy, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.
  • Leano J; Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, University of California San Francisco/San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.
  • Miaskowski C; Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
  • Mastick J; Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
  • Brinker L; Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, University of California San Francisco/San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.
  • Topp K; Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
  • Smoot B; Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Electronic address: betty.smoot@gmail.com.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 102(8): 1465-1472.e2, 2021 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872573
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure massage treatment (NPMT) compared with manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) in women with chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE). We hypothesized that NPMT would result in greater improvements in LE and upper limb function.

DESIGN:

Pilot single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

SETTING:

Health sciences university.

PARTICIPANTS:

Of 64 women screened, 28 met eligibility requirements (ie, >18y of age; completed active treatment for breast cancer; had unilateral arm LE for ≥1y; were not receiving LE care; had stable LE) and were randomized to the NPMT (n=15) and control groups (n=13).

INTERVENTIONS:

The intervention group received NPMT and the control group received MLD; both received twelve 60-minute sessions over 4-6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Bioimpedance (lymphedema index [L-Dex] units]), limb volume (mL) calculated from limb circumference, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) score.

RESULTS:

Outcomes were analyzed for 28 women. Compared to the MLD group, the NPMT group demonstrated greater improvement with a large effect size in L-Dex scores (P=.001; standardized mean difference [SMD]=-1.15; 95% confidence interval, -1.96 to -0.35) and interlimb volume differences (P=.038; SMD=-0.83; 95% confidence interval, -1.60 to -0.05). Differences in DASH scores were not statistically significant (P=.067).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared to MLD, treatment with NPMT resulted in greater improvement in L-Dex scores and interlimb volume differences in women with a duration of unilateral upper limb LE of >1 year. Our findings need to be confirmed in a larger randomized controlled trial.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama / Massagem Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama / Massagem Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article