Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Allocation changes in heart transplantation: What has really changed?
Ganapathi, Asvin M; Lampert, Brent C; Mokadam, Nahush A; Emani, Sitaramesh; Hasan, Ayesha K; Tamer, Robert; Whitson, Bryan A.
Afiliação
  • Ganapathi AM; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: Asvin.Ganapathi@osumc.edu.
  • Lampert BC; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Mokadam NA; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Emani S; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Hasan AK; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Tamer R; Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Whitson BA; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 165(2): 724-733.e7, 2023 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33875259
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

In 2018, the heart allocation system changed status classifications and broadened geographic distribution. We examined this change at a national level based on the immediate pre- and postchange periods.

METHODS:

Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database, we identified all adult primary, isolated heart transplants from October 18, 2017, to October 17, 2019. Two time periods were compared (1) October 18, 2017, to October 17, 2018 (pre); and (2) October 18, 2018, to October 17, 2019 (post). Comparisons were made between groups, and a multivariable logistic regression model was created to identify factors associated with pretransplant temporary mechanical circulatory support. Volume analysis at the regional, state, and center level was also conducted as the primary focus.

RESULTS:

A total of 5381 independent heart transplants were identified within the time frame. On unadjusted analysis, there was a significant increase in temporary mechanical circulatory support (pre, 11.1%; post, 36.2%, P < .01) and decrease in waitlist days (pre, 93 days; post, 41 days; P < .01). Distance traveled (nautical miles) (pre, 83; post, 225; P < .01) and ischemic time (hours) (pre, 3.0; post, 3.4; P < .01) were significantly increased. On multivariable analysis, the postallocation time period was independently associated with temporary MCS (odds ratio, 4.463; 95% confidence interval, 3.844-5.183; P < .001). Transplant volumes did not significantly change after the allocation change at a regional, state, and center level.

CONCLUSIONS:

Since the planned alteration to the allocation system, there have been changes in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support as well as distance and ischemic time associated with transplant, but no significant volume changes were observed. Continued observation of outcomes and volume under the new allocation system will be necessary in the upcoming years.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea / Coração Auxiliar / Transplante de Coração Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea / Coração Auxiliar / Transplante de Coração Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article