Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chest X-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study.
Bradley, Stephen H; Bhartia, Bobby Sk; Callister, Matthew Ej; Hamilton, William T; Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding; Kennedy, Martyn Pt; Mounce, Luke Ta; Shinkins, Bethany; Wheatstone, Pete; Neal, Richard D.
Afiliação
  • Bradley SH; Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds.
  • Bhartia BS; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds.
  • Callister ME; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds.
  • Hamilton WT; College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter.
  • Hatton NLF; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds.
  • Kennedy MP; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds.
  • Mounce LT; College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter.
  • Shinkins B; Test Evaluation Group, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds.
  • Wheatstone P; CanTest Collaborative, c/o Academic Unit of Primary Care, University of Leeds, Leeds.
  • Neal RD; Academic Unit of Primary Care, University of Leeds, Leeds.
Br J Gen Pract ; 71(712): e862-e868, 2021 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33875450
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Chest X-ray (CXR) is the first-line investigation for lung cancer in many healthcare systems. An understanding of the consequences of false-negative CXRs on time to diagnosis, stage, and survival is limited.

AIM:

To determine the sensitivity of CXR for lung cancer and to compare stage at diagnosis, time to diagnosis, and survival between those with CXR that detected, or did not detect, lung cancer. DESIGN AND

SETTING:

Retrospective observational study using routinely collected healthcare data.

METHOD:

All patients diagnosed with lung cancer in Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust during 2008-2015 who had a GP-requested CXR in the year before diagnosis were categorised based on the result of the earliest CXR performed in that period. The sensitivity of CXR was calculated and analyses were performed with respect to time to diagnosis, survival, and stage at diagnosis.

RESULTS:

CXR was negative for 17.7% of patients (n = 376/2129). Median time from initial CXR to diagnosis was 43 days for those with a positive CXR and 204 days for those with a negative CXR. Of those with a positive CXR, 29.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 27.9% to 31.8%) were diagnosed at stage I or II, compared with 33.5% (95% CI = 28.8% to 38.6%) with a negative CXR.

CONCLUSION:

GPs should consider lung cancer in patients with persistent symptoms even when CXR is negative. Despite longer duration to diagnosis for those with false-negative CXRs, there was no evidence of an adverse impact on stage at diagnosis or survival; however, this comparison is likely to be affected by confounding variables.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Testiculares / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Testiculares / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article