Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Oncological and Operative Outcomes.
Kong, Joseph C; Soucisse, Mikael; Michael, Michael; Tie, Jeanne; Ngan, Samuel Y; Leong, Trevor; McCormick, Jacob; Warrier, Satish K; Heriot, Alexander G.
Afiliação
  • Kong JC; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. joekong@gmail.com.
  • Soucisse M; Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. joekong@gmail.com.
  • Michael M; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. joekong@gmail.com.
  • Tie J; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Ngan SY; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
  • Leong T; Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • McCormick J; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
  • Warrier SK; Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Heriot AG; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(12): 7476-7486, 2021 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33891203
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer refers to the administration of chemoradiotherapy plus chemotherapy before surgery. Recent studies have shown improved pathological complete response and disease-free survival with this approach. However, survival benefits remain unproven. Our objective is to present a metaanalysis of oncological outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

A comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholars. Studies comparing total neoadjuvant therapy with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were included. Data extracted from the individual studies were pooled and a metaanalysis performed. The outcomes of interest are the rate of complete pathological response, nodal response, resection margin, anal preservation, anastomotic leak, local recurrence, distant recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS:

There were 15 comparative studies with 2437 patients in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group and 2284 in the total neoadjuvant therapy group. The pooled complete pathological response was 22.3% in the total neoadjuvant therapy group, compared with 14.2% in the standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (p < 0.001). Even though there was no difference in local recurrence rate, there was a significantly lower rate of distant recurrence (OR 0.81, p = 0.02), and better 3-year disease-free survival (70.6% vs. 65.3%, respectively, p < 0.001) and overall survival (84.9% vs. 82.3%, respectively, p = 0.006), favoring the total neoadjuvant therapy group. Due to significant heterogeneity in the study protocols, there remains uncertainty on the ideal chemotherapy/radiotherapy sequence.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study provides supporting evidence on the favorable immediate and intermediate oncological outcomes with the use of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Terapia Neoadjuvante Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Terapia Neoadjuvante Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article