Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep Learning Estimation of 10-2 and 24-2 Visual Field Metrics Based on Thickness Maps from Macula OCT.
Christopher, Mark; Bowd, Christopher; Proudfoot, James A; Belghith, Akram; Goldbaum, Michael H; Rezapour, Jasmin; Fazio, Massimo A; Girkin, Christopher A; De Moraes, Gustavo; Liebmann, Jeffrey M; Weinreb, Robert N; Zangwill, Linda M.
Afiliação
  • Christopher M; Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Bowd C; Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Proudfoot JA; Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Belghith A; Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Goldbaum MH; Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Rezapour J; Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Fazio MA; School of Medicine, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Girkin CA; School of Medicine, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • De Moraes G; Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • Liebmann JM; Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • Weinreb RN; Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Zangwill LM; Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: lzangwill@ucsd.edu.
Ophthalmology ; 128(11): 1534-1548, 2021 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33901527
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To develop deep learning (DL) systems estimating visual function from macula-centered spectral-domain (SD) OCT images.

DESIGN:

Evaluation of a diagnostic technology.

PARTICIPANTS:

A total of 2408 10-2 visual field (VF) SD OCT pairs and 2999 24-2 VF SD OCT pairs collected from 645 healthy and glaucoma subjects (1222 eyes).

METHODS:

Deep learning models were trained on thickness maps from Spectralis macula SD OCT to estimate 10-2 and 24-2 VF mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD). Individual and combined DL models were trained using thickness data from 6 layers (retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], ganglion cell layer [GCL], inner plexiform layer [IPL], ganglion cell-IPL [GCIPL], ganglion cell complex [GCC] and retina). Linear regression of mean layer thicknesses were used for comparison. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Deep learning models were evaluated using R2 and mean absolute error (MAE) compared with 10-2 and 24-2 VF measurements.

RESULTS:

Combined DL models estimating 10-2 achieved R2 of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.89) for MD and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.55-0.81) for PSD and MAEs of 1.9 dB (95% CI, 1.6-2.4 dB) for MD and 1.5 dB (95% CI, 1.2-1.9 dB) for PSD. This was significantly better than mean thickness estimates for 10-2 MD (0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.71] and 3.0 dB [95% CI, 2.5-3.5 dB]) and 10-2 PSD (0.46 [95% CI, 0.31-0.60] and 2.3 dB [95% CI, 1.8-2.7 dB]). Combined DL models estimating 24-2 achieved R2 of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84) for MD and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53-0.79) for PSD and MAEs of 2.1 dB (95% CI, 1.8-2.5 dB) for MD and 1.5 dB (95% CI, 1.3-1.9 dB) for PSD. This was significantly better than mean thickness estimates for 24-2 MD (0.41 [95% CI, 0.26-0.57] and 3.4 dB [95% CI, 2.7-4.5 dB]) and 24-2 PSD (0.38 [95% CI, 0.20-0.57] and 2.4 dB [95% CI, 2.0-2.8 dB]). The GCIPL (R2 = 0.79) and GCC (R2 = 0.75) had the highest performance estimating 10-2 and 24-2 MD, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Deep learning models improved estimates of functional loss from SD OCT imaging. Accurate estimates can help clinicians to individualize VF testing to patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Campos Visuais / Glaucoma / Tomografia de Coerência Óptica / Aprendizado Profundo / Pressão Intraocular / Macula Lutea Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Campos Visuais / Glaucoma / Tomografia de Coerência Óptica / Aprendizado Profundo / Pressão Intraocular / Macula Lutea Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article