Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Rates and Risk Factors of Intra-Pedicular Accuracy and Proximal Facet Joint Violation for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: Cortical Bone Trajectory Versus Traditional Trajectory Pedicle Screw.
Zhang, Ren-Jie; Zhou, Lu-Ping; Zhang, Lai; Zhang, Hua-Qing; Ge, Peng; Jia, Chong-Yu; Zhang, Yong; Zhang, Jian-Xiang; Shen, Cai-Liang.
Afiliação
  • Zhang RJ; Department of Orthopedics and Spine Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 46(23): E1274-E1282, 2021 Dec 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33907083
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and proximal facet joint violation (FJV) in single-level degenerative lumbar diseases using cortical bone trajectory (CBT) and traditional trajectory (TT) techniques, and analyze their possible risk factors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CBT screws have been utilized increasingly to improve cortical bone contact to prevent screw pullout and reduce approach-related morbidity. However, the studies on intra-pedicular accuracy and proximal FJV between the two methods are rare. METHODS: A total of 40 patients who required single-level instruments were included in the retrospective study treated with the CBT-TLIF and the TT-TLIF at a 1:1 ratio from March 2019 to August 2020. The radiographic outcomes were the intra-pedicular accuracy and proximal FJV. Moreover, the possible risk factors were assessed using bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: As for the intra-pedicular accuracy, 73 screws (91.3%) were classified as grade A, 7 screws (8.7%) classified as grade B in the CBT group. A total of 71 screws (88.8%) were graded A with remaining 8 screws (10.0%) graded B and 1 screw (1.2%) graded C in the TT group. The proportion of optimal and clinically acceptable screw positions in the two groups were not significantly different (P > 0.05). In addition, the rate of proximal FJV in CBT approach (8.3%) was significantly lower than that in the TT approach (35.0%) (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed the TT insertion approach and facet angle ≥45° were the independent risk factors for proximal FJV, but no factors above affected intra-pedicular accuracy. CONCLUSION: Compared with the TT approach in TLIF, the CBT approach showed similar intra-pedicular accuracy and remarkable superiority in proximal facet joint protection. Facet angle ≥45° is the independent risk factors for proximal FJV.Level of Evidence: 2.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Articulação Zigapofisária / Parafusos Pediculares / Ftirápteros Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Articulação Zigapofisária / Parafusos Pediculares / Ftirápteros Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article