Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reasons for presenteeism in different occupational branches in Sweden: a population based cross-sectional study.
Marklund, Staffan; Gustafsson, Klas; Bergström, Gunnar; Leineweber, Constanze.
Afiliação
  • Marklund S; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Gustafsson K; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. klas.gustafsson@ki.se.
  • Bergström G; Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.
  • Leineweber C; Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 94(6): 1385-1395, 2021 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33914162
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the prevalence and reasons for presenteeism in occupations in three branches defined as employees handling people, handling things or handling symbols.

METHOD:

A cross-sectional population-based cohort study was conducted. The study group was drawn from a representative sample (n = 6230) aged 16-64, who had been interviewed in 2015 or in 2017 for the Swedish Work Environment Surveys (SWES). The odds ratios (ORs) stratified by occupational category for reasons of presenteeism, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were estimated using binomial multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS:

The study showed that presenteeism was more common among employees handling people (74%), when compared to employees handling things (65%) or handling symbols (70%). The most common reason for presenteeism among employees handling people was "I do not want to burden my colleagues", while "Because nobody else can carry out my responsibilities" was most common in the other two categories. After control for socio-demography, work environments and health, the differences in reasons mostly remained significant between the three occupational categories.

CONCLUSION:

The differences between occupational categories are important for prevalence and reasons for presenteeism. As presenteeism affects the future health of employees and the productivity of the work unit, attempts to reduce presenteeism may be important. Because the reasons vary between occupations, customized preventive measures should be applied in different occupational settings. Among employees handling people, covering up for absence in work team is relevant, while among employees handling symbols and handling things the corresponding focus could be on shared responsibilities for specific tasks.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Local de Trabalho / Presenteísmo Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Local de Trabalho / Presenteísmo Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article