Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is third molar development affected by third molar impaction or impaction-related parameters?
Saputri, Rosalina Intan; De Tobel, Jannick; Vranckx, Myrthel; Ockerman, Anna; Van Vlierberghe, Martine; Fieuws, Steffen; Thevissen, Patrick.
Afiliação
  • Saputri RI; Forensic Odontology, Department of Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, blok a - box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. rosalina.saputri@gmail.com.
  • De Tobel J; Faculty of Dentistry, Maranatha Christian University, Jalan Surya Sumantri no. 65, Sukawarna, Sukajadi, Kota Bandung, 40164, Indonesia. rosalina.saputri@gmail.com.
  • Vranckx M; Forensic Odontology, Department of Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, blok a - box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Ockerman A; OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Van Vlierberghe M; OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Fieuws S; OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging & Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Thevissen P; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Clin Oral Investig ; 25(12): 6681-6693, 2021 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33934201
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the effect of third molar impaction and impaction-related parameters on third molar development. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Panoramic radiographs (N=3972) from 473 males and 558 females between 3.2 and 23.5 years old were analysed. Three parameters of impaction were examined hindering contact between third and adjacent second molar, retromolar space availability (only in lower third molars), and angulation between the third and adjacent second molar. From the separate parameters, a definition for impaction was derived. Third molars' development was staged according to a modified Köhler et al. staging technique. A linear model was used to compare within-stage and overall age, as a function of hindering contact, retromolar space, and impaction. Furthermore, a quadratic function was used to study the correlation between age and angulation.

RESULTS:

Significant differences were found in mean age as a function of hindering contact and retromolar space, depending on third molar location and stage. There was a significant relation between angulation and age, depending on the stage, with all third molars evolving to a more upright position (closer to 0°). Mean ages of subjects with impacted third molars were significantly lower in certain third molar stages, but the differences were clinically small (absolute differences ≤0.65 years). Moreover, after correction for stage differences, no significant differences in age could be demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS:

The development of impacted and non-impacted third molars can be considered clinically equal in our study population. CLINICAL RELEVANCE There is no distinction required between impacted and non-impacted third molars for dental age estimation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dente Impactado / Dente Serotino Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dente Impactado / Dente Serotino Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article