Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Social media in undergraduate medical education: A systematic review.
Guckian, Jonathan; Utukuri, Mrudula; Asif, Aqua; Burton, Oliver; Adeyoju, Joshua; Oumeziane, Adam; Chu, Timothy; Rees, Eliot L.
Afiliação
  • Guckian J; Dermatology Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Yorkshire, UK.
  • Utukuri M; School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  • Asif A; School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Burton O; Leicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Adeyoju J; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
  • Oumeziane A; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Chu T; School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.
  • Rees EL; School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Med Educ ; 55(11): 1227-1241, 2021 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33988867
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

There are over 3.81 billion worldwide active social media (SoMe) users. SoMe are ubiquitous in medical education, with roles across undergraduate programmes, including professionalism, blended learning, well being and mentoring. Previous systematic reviews took place before recent explosions in SoMe popularity and revealed a paucity of high-quality empirical studies assessing its effectiveness in medical education. This review aimed to synthesise evidence regarding SoMe interventions in undergraduate medical education, to identify features associated with positive and negative outcomes.

METHODS:

Authors searched 31 key terms through seven databases, in addition to references, citation and hand searching, between 16 June and 16 July 2020. Studies describing SoMe interventions and research on exposure to existing SoMe were included. Title, abstract and full paper screening were undertaken independently by two reviewers. Included papers were assessed for methodological quality using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) and/or the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) instrument. Extracted data were synthesised using narrative synthesis.

RESULTS:

112 studies from 26 countries met inclusion criteria. Methodological quality of included studies had not significantly improved since 2013. Engagement and satisfaction with SoMe platforms in medical education are described. Students felt SoMe flattened hierarchies and improved communication with educators. SoMe use was associated with improvement in objective knowledge assessment scores and self-reported clinical and professional performance, however evidence for long term knowledge retention was limited. SoMe use was occasionally linked to adverse impacts upon mental and physical health. Professionalism was heavily investigated and considered important, though generally negative correlations between SoMe use and medical professionalism may exist.

CONCLUSIONS:

Social media is enjoyable for students who may improve short term knowledge retention and can aid communication between learners and educators. However, higher-quality study is required to identify longer-term impact upon knowledge and skills, provide clarification on professionalism standards and protect against harms.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação Médica / Educação de Graduação em Medicina / Mídias Sociais Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação Médica / Educação de Graduação em Medicina / Mídias Sociais Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article