Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review.
Sosa, Ernesto; D'Souza, Gail; Akhtar, Aamna; Sur, Melissa; Love, Kyra; Duffels, Jeanette; Raz, Dan J; Kim, Jae Y; Sun, Virginia; Erhunmwunsee, Loretta.
Afiliação
  • Sosa E; Department of Populations Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
  • D'Souza G; Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
  • Akhtar A; Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
  • Sur M; Department of Populations Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
  • Love K; Division of Library Services, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
  • Duffels J; Division of Library Services, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
  • Raz DJ; Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
  • Kim JY; Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
  • Sun V; Department of Populations Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
  • Erhunmwunsee L; Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 71(4): 299-314, 2021 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34015860
ABSTRACT
Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths. Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces NSCLC mortality; however, a lack of diversity in LCS studies may limit the generalizability of the results to marginalized groups who face higher risk for and worse outcomes from NSCLC. Identifying sources of inequity in the LCS pipeline is essential to reduce disparities in NSCLC outcomes. The authors searched 3 major databases for studies published from January 1, 2010 to February 27, 2020 that met the following criteria 1) included screenees between ages 45 and 80 years who were current or former smokers, 2) written in English, 3) conducted in the United States, and 4) discussed socioeconomic and race-based LCS outcomes. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias. Of 3721 studies screened, 21 were eligible. Eligible studies were evaluated, and their findings were categorized into 3 themes related to LCS disparities faced by Black and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals 1) eligibility; 2) utilization, perception, and utility; and 3) postscreening behavior and care. Disparities in LCS exist along racial and socioeconomic lines. There are several steps along the LCS pipeline in which Black and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals miss the potential benefits of LCS, resulting in increased mortality. This study identified potential sources of inequity that require further investigation. The authors recommend the implementation of prospective trials that evaluate eligibility criteria for underserved groups and the creation of interventions focused on improving utilization and follow-up care to decrease LCS disparities.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article