Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Hygiene Procedures on Lens Case Contamination with Povidone-Iodine or Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions.
Nakagawa, Masahiro; Nakagawa, Ritsue; Willcox, Mark D P; Vijay, Ajay Kumar.
Afiliação
  • Nakagawa R; Ophtecs Corporation, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Willcox MDP; School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Vijay AK; School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Optom Vis Sci ; 98(6): 563-569, 2021 06 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34039910
ABSTRACT

SIGNIFICANCE:

A multipurpose disinfecting solution (MPDS), which contains povidone-iodine (PI) as a disinfectant, has high disinfecting efficacy not only on planktonic bacterium but also on the case biofilms. The addition of case hygiene practice removed more bacteria from cases than MPDS alone.

PURPOSE:

This study compared the ability of two MPDSs, one containing PI and another containing polyaminopropyl biguanide and polyquaternium, to reduce bacterial numbers in solution or adhered to the cases following case hygiene procedures.

METHODS:

Bacterial strains (Delftia acidovorans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis) were exposed to the MPDSs for the recommended disinfection times, and the viable number evaluated according to ISO 14729. Cases were inoculated with bacterial strains and incubated for 24 hours to allow for biofilm formation. Cases were disinfected with both disinfecting solutions for 4 hours and rinsed, followed by recapping or air-drying, or tissue-wiping and air-drying for 18 hours. The number of survivors was counted using standard culture techniques.

RESULTS:

Both products exceeded the recommended 3-log reduction against planktonic bacteria. Regarding biofilm, after rinsing and recapping wet, the numbers of D. acidovorans (mean difference [95% confidence interval] log10 colony-forming units per case, -2.9 [0.8 to -4.6], P < .01), P. aeruginosa (-2.0 [0.5 to -3.1], P < .01), S. marcescens (-1.7 [0.8 to -3.5], P < .05), and S. epidermidis (-2.1 [0.6 to -3.5], P < .05) in PI cases were significantly lower than in the dual-disinfectant MPDS storage cases. After air-drying, the PI storage cases had significantly lower numbers of S. maltophilia (-2.6 [0.6 to -4.0], P < .01), D. acidovorans (-1.6 [0.7 to -3.3], P < .05), and S. aureus (-1.6 [0.7 to -3.1], P < .05). The addition of tissue-wiping reduced the bacterial numbers in the MPDS storage cases to levels in the PI storage cases.

CONCLUSIONS:

Contact lens users should be recommended to tissue-wipe and air-dry their lens storage cases after disinfection with regular MPDS.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Soluções para Lentes de Contato / Lentes de Contato Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Soluções para Lentes de Contato / Lentes de Contato Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article