Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Examining electrometer performance checks with direct-current generator in a clinic: Assessment of generated charges and implementation of electrometer checks.
Kinoshita, Naoki; Oguchi, Hiroshi; Shimizu, Morihito; Kidoya, Eiji; Shioura, Hiroki; Kimura, Hirohiko.
Afiliação
  • Kinoshita N; Radiological Center, University of Fukui Hospital, Fukui, Japan.
  • Oguchi H; Department of Radiological and Medical Laboratory Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Shimizu M; National Metrology Institute of Japan, AIST, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Kidoya E; Radiological Center, University of Fukui Hospital, Fukui, Japan.
  • Shioura H; Department of Radiology, University of Fukui Hospital, Fukui, Japan.
  • Kimura H; Department of Radiology, University of Fukui Hospital, Fukui, Japan.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 22(7): 306-312, 2021 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34085364
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Medical physicists use a suitable detector connected to an electrometer to measure radiotherapy beams. Each detector and electrometer has a lifetime (due to physical deterioration of detector components and electrical characteristic deterioration in electronic electrometer components), long-term stability [according to IEC 607312011, ≤0.5% (reference-class dosimeter)], and calibration frequency [according to Muir et al. (J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017; 18182-190), generally 2 years]; thus, physicists should check the electrometer and detector separately. However, to the best of our knowledge, only one study (Blad et al., Phys Med Biol. 1998; 432385-2391) has reported checking the electrometer independently from the detector. The present study conducts performance checks on electrometers separately from the detector in clinical settings, using an electrometer equipped with a direct current (DC) generator (EMF 521R) capable of injecting DC (effective range ±20 pA to ±20 nA) into itself or another electrometer.

METHODS:

First, to check the nonlinearity of the generated currents from ±20 pA to ±20 nA, charges generated from the DC generator were measured with the EMF 521R electrometer. Next, six reference-class electrometers classified according to IEC 607312011 were checked for repeatability at a current of ±20 pA or a minimum effective indicated value meeting IEC 607312011, as well as for nonlinearity within the current range from ±20 pA to ±20 nA.

RESULTS:

The nonlinearities for the measured currents were less than ±0.05%. The repeatability for the six electrometers was < 0.1%. While the nonlinearity of one electrometer reached up to 0.22% at a current of -20 pA, all six electrometers displayed nonlinearities of less than ±0.1% at currents of ±100 pA or higher.

CONCLUSIONS:

This work suggests that it is possible to check the nonlinearity and repeatability of clinical electrometers with DCs above the ±30 pA level using a DC generator in a clinic.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Eletrônica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Eletrônica Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article