Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment breaks in first line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis.
Adams, Richard; Goey, Kaitlyn; Chibaudel, Benoist; Koopman, Miriam; Punt, Cornelis; Arnold, Dirk; Hinke, Axel; Hegewisch-Becker, Susanna; de Gramont, Aimery; Labianca, Roberto; Diaz Rubio, Eduardo; Magne Tveit, Kjell; Wasan, Harpreet; Kaplan, Richard; Brown, Louise; Maughan, Tim; Fisher, David.
Afiliação
  • Adams R; Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Richard.adams@wales.nhs.uk.
  • Goey K; University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: k.k.h.goey@umcutrecht.nl.
  • Chibaudel B; Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique, Paris, France. Electronic address: benoist.chibaudel@ihfb.org.
  • Koopman M; University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: M.Koopman-6@umcutrecht.nl.
  • Punt C; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Electronic address: C.J.A.Punt@umcutrecht.nl.
  • Arnold D; Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Germany and Instituto CUF de Oncologia, Lisbon, Portugal. Electronic address: dirk.arnold@arcor.de.
  • Hinke A; CCRC, Düsseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: axel.hinke@hotmail.de.
  • Hegewisch-Becker S; Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: hegewisch@t-online.de.
  • de Gramont A; Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France. Electronic address: aimery.de-gramont@sat.aphp.fr.
  • Labianca R; Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy. Electronic address: rlabian@tin.it.
  • Diaz Rubio E; Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: ediazrg@seom.org.
  • Magne Tveit K; Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Electronic address: kjell.magne.tveit@ous-hf.no.
  • Wasan H; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, United Kingdom. Electronic address: h.wasan@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Kaplan R; MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, United Kingdom. Electronic address: r.kaplan@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Brown L; MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, United Kingdom. Electronic address: l.brown@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Maughan T; University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: tim.maughan@oncology.ox.ac.uk.
  • Fisher D; MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, United Kingdom. Electronic address: d.fisher@ucl.ac.uk.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 99: 102226, 2021 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34130171
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Intermittent systemic anti-cancer therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) may improve quality of life without compromising overall survival (OS). We aimed to use individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) from multiple randomised controlled trials evaluating intermittent strategies to inform clinical practice. We also aimed to validate whether thrombocytosis as a predictive biomarker identified patients with significantly reduced OS receiving a complete treatment break. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

An IPDMA of intermittent strategy impact on survival was undertaken, including all relevant trials in which data were available. Intermittent strategies were classified into two groups a planned stopping of all therapy ("treatment break strategy"; 6 trials; 2,907 patients) or to the same treatment omitting oxaliplatin ("maintenance strategy"; 3 trials; 1,271 patients). The primary analysis sample was of patients successfully completing induction therapy. Additionally, a pre-planned analysis of the predictive value of thrombocytosis on survival under a continuous versus an intermittent strategy was undertaken.

RESULTS:

All trials had comparable inclusion criteria. The overall IPDMA of intermittent therapy versus continuous therapy demonstrated no detriment in OS (HR = 1.03 [95% CI 0.93-1.14]), whether from complete break (HR 1.04 [95% CI 0.87-1.26]) or maintenance strategies (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.87-1.13]). Thrombocytosis was confirmed as a marker of poor prognosis in aCRC, but did not predict for OS detriment from treatment break strategies (interaction HR = 0.97 [95% CI 0.66-1.40] compared to continuous therapy).

CONCLUSION:

The highest levels of evidence from this IPDMA indicate no detriment in survival for patients receiving an intermittent therapy strategy, either for maintenance or complete break strategies. Although, thrombocytosis is confirmed as a marker of poor prognosis, it is not predictive of poor outcome for patients treated with intermittent therapy. An intermittent chemotherapy strategy can therefore be applied irrespective of baseline platelet count and does not result in inferior OS compared to continuous chemotherapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article