Ultra-low-dose cone-beam CT compared to standard dose in the assessment for acute fractures.
Skeletal Radiol
; 51(1): 153-159, 2022 Jan.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34132888
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) is superior in fracture detection than conventional radiography; however, dose is increased. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers higher spatial resolution and lower dose than MDCT. Manufacturers offer an ultra-low-dose algorithm. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of the ultra-low-dose CBCT (ULDCBCT) with that of the standard-dose CBCT (SDCBCT). MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
In total, 64 patients were scanned with both the SDCBCT and the ULDCBCT protocols. Both studies were reported by two consultant radiologists with fellowship training in emergency radiology separated in time. The reporter recorded a diagnosis of fracture or normal and diagnostic confidence using a 5-point Likert scale. The gold standard was taken as the SDCBCT. Reporters were blinded to the indication and the SDCBCT report. Cases of discrepancy were resolved by consensus.RESULTS:
There were 34 fractures and 30 cases had no fracture. Several fractures were missed using the UDCBCT, and there were also several cases of overdiagnosis. ULD was inferior to SD for fracture diagnosis (p < 0.00001). The diagnostic accuracy of ULDCBCT was 82.8% (75.1-88.9 CI). The diagnostic accuracy of plain radiograph was 64% (55.1-75.7% CI). Diagnostic confidence was reduced; the mean confidence for SDCBCT was 4.68 vs 4.12 for ULDCBCT (p < 0.001). The Kappa for interobserver agreement was 0.6.CONCLUSION:
ULDCBCT is inferior to SDCBCT in fracture detection and confidence is reduced. For diagnostic studies, the standard dose should be used.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Radiologia
/
Fraturas Ósseas
Tipo de estudo:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Guideline
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Article