Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training: a EULAR School of Rheumatology initiative.
van Onna, Marloes; Ramiro, Sofia; Haines, Catherine; Holland-Fischer, Mette; da Silva, Jose Antonio Pereira; Dudler, Jean; Edwards, Chris; Alunno, Alessia; Nikiphorou, Elena; Falzon, Louise; Sivera, Francisca.
Afiliação
  • van Onna M; Department of Medicine, division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands m.van.onna@mumc.nl.
  • Ramiro S; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Haines C; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Holland-Fischer M; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
  • da Silva JAP; Centre for Teaching and Learning, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Dudler J; Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Edwards C; Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Alunno A; Department of Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Nikiphorou E; Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research, Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Falzon L; Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Cantonal de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
  • Sivera F; NIHR Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
RMD Open ; 7(2)2021 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34135115
OBJECTIVE: About half of the rheumatology trainees do not use a portfolio. This project was established to reach consensus about the content of a EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training and subsequently develop portfolio assessment forms. METHODS: After establishing a portfolio working group (WG), including nine rheumatologists and one educationalist, a systematic literature review (SLR) on the content and structure of portfolios for postgraduate learning was conducted (November 2018). This was followed by a survey among WG members and members of the EMerging EUlar NETwork, inquiring about the content and structure of existing national portfolios. The portfolio WG selected the key components of the portfolio, taking previous experience and feasibility into account. Assessment forms (eg, case-based discussion) were developed and pilot-tested. RESULTS: 13/2034 articles were included in the SLR (12 high/1 moderate risk of bias). Information on procedural skills, personal reflections, learning goals and multisource feedback was most often included a portfolio. Twenty-five respondents completed the survey (response≈50%). Feedback from assessors, reflective writing and formulation of learning goals were considered important dimensions to be covered in a portfolio. Six key components of the portfolio were established: curriculum vitae, personal development plan, clinical work, professional behaviours, education and research activities. Suggested minimal content for each component was formulated. Four assessment forms were successfully pilot-tested by 11 rheumatologists and their trainees. CONCLUSION: A EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training and assessment forms were developed. Portfolio implementation, particularly in countries without an existing portfolio, may promote a higher standard of rheumatology training across Europe.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reumatologia Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reumatologia Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article