Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative effects of insulin glulisine and lispro on postprandial plasma glucose and lipid profile in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Yamada, Mika; Suzuki, Jinya; Nakaya, Takahiro; Ichikawa, Mai; Yamamoto, Katsushi; Imagawa, Michiko; Sato, Satsuki; Fujii, Miki; Zenimaru, Yasuo; Konoshita, Tadashi; Ishizuka, Tamotsu.
Afiliação
  • Yamada M; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, 910-1193 Japan.
  • Suzuki J; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, 910-1193 Japan.
  • Nakaya T; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, 910-1193 Japan.
  • Ichikawa M; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, 910-1193 Japan.
  • Yamamoto K; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, 910-1193 Japan.
  • Imagawa M; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, 910-1193 Japan.
  • Sato S; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, 910-1193 Japan.
  • Fujii M; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, 910-1193 Japan.
  • Zenimaru Y; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, 910-1193 Japan.
  • Konoshita T; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, 910-1193 Japan.
  • Ishizuka T; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, 910-1193 Japan.
Diabetol Int ; 12(3): 330-335, 2021 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34150441
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The control of postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) excursions is critical in the prevention of diabetic complications. Controversy remains on the differences in postprandial actions of insulin glulisine and lispro. The aim of this study was to define the differences in the efficacy of these two insulin analogues on PPG.

METHODS:

The study subjects were 20 in-hospital patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Plasma glucose (PG) was tightly controlled with basal insulin and insulin glulisine or lispro, and then glulisine or lispro were switched to the other insulin analog every other day for 6 study days. PG was measured before breakfast and 0.5-, 1-, and 2 h-postprandial during the study. Postprandial plasma C-peptide and lipids were analyzed in the first 2 days of the study. Postprandial increments in each parameter were compared between glulisine and lispro.

RESULTS:

Whereas the median value of 0.5 h-Δ-PPG was comparable in glulisine and lispro, the 1 h-Δ-PPG was significantly lower with lispro than with glulisine (41 vs 53 mg/dl, respectively, p = 0.03). Similarly, the 2 h-Δ-PPG with lispro was 10 mg/dl lower than that with glulisine (35 vs 45 mg/dl, respectively, p = 0.05). In parallel with PPG, Δ-C-peptide at 1- and 2 h-postprandial were significantly lower with lispro than glulisine (0.50 vs 0.75 ng/ml, respectively, and 0.55 vs 0.75 ng/ml, respectively). The increment in LDL-C and HDL-C was significantly lower with lispro than with glulisine at 0.5 h-postprandial.

CONCLUSION:

Insulin lispro seems superior to glulisine in the control of PPG in Japanese patients with T2DM.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article