Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Second Victim Experience and Perception Discordance of the Colonoscopic Perforation.
Cho, Dan Bi; Lee, Won; Cha, Jae Myung; Kim, Jee Hyun; Kim, Jinsu; Kang, Sang Bum; Eun, Chang Soo.
Afiliação
  • Cho DB; Department of Medical Law and Bioethics, Yonsei University Graduate School, Asian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee W; Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Oness38@hanmail.net.
  • Cha JM; Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JH; Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim J; Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Eunpyeong, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang SB; Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
  • Eun CS; Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Republic of Korea.
Dig Dis Sci ; 67(7): 2857-2865, 2022 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34283361
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Perforation is the most serious adverse event of colonoscopy, but rarely considered from the view of colonoscopists' second victim experience and perception discordance between colonoscopists and patients.

AIMS:

We aimed to evaluate colonoscopists' second victim experience and the perception discordance between colonoscopists and patients for the colonoscopic perforation.

METHODS:

A survey for colonoscopic perforation was performed for the colonoscopists and outpatients who visited the university hospital between February 1, 2020, and April 30, 2020. The questionnaire included questions regarding colonoscopists' satisfaction for the intervention strategies offered to patients and patient-colonoscopist perception on colonoscopic perforation. A modified Korean version of the "Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (K-SVEST)" was used to assess the second victim experiences and supportive resources for the colonoscopists.

RESULTS:

Survey results from 160 colonoscopists and 165 patients were analyzed. The colonoscopists' satisfaction scores were higher for strategies related to sufficient explanation, empathy, courteous listening, and monetary compensation. The scores of the K-SVEST for the second victim experience were highest in psychological distress, followed by loss of professional self-efficacy, colleague support, physical distress, non-work-related support, institutional support, and turnover intentions/absenteeism. Significant patient-colonoscopist discordance was noted for the same colonoscopic perforation scenario on the judgment of medical error, health professionals' apology, monetary compensation, and criminal penalties for the colonoscopists.

CONCLUSIONS:

Colonoscopists can suffer emotionally and physically from the second victim experience after colonoscopic perforation. In addition, the significant patient-colonoscopist discordance should be considered to make a better communication for the colonoscopic perforation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Colonoscopia / Perfuração Intestinal Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Colonoscopia / Perfuração Intestinal Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article