Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Challenges to Implementation of the Co-Curriculum in Accredited Pharmacy Programs.
Maerten-Rivera, Jaime L; Chen, Aleda M H; Augustine, Jill; d'Assalenaux, Richard; Lindsey, Cameron C; Malcom, Daniel R; Mauro, Laurie S; Pavuluri, Nina; Rudolph, Michael J; Wong, Siu Fun; Zeeman, Jacqueline M; Zeszotarski, Paula.
Afiliação
  • Maerten-Rivera JL; State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, New York jmaerten@buffalo.edu.
  • Chen AMH; Cedarville University, School of Pharmacy, Cedarville, Ohio.
  • Augustine J; Mercer University, College of Pharmacy, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • d'Assalenaux R; West Coast University, School of Pharmacy, Los Angeles, California.
  • Lindsey CC; University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, Missouri.
  • Malcom DR; Sullivan University, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Louisville, Kentucky.
  • Mauro LS; Associate Editor, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Arlington, Virginia.
  • Pavuluri N; University of Toledo, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toledo, Ohio.
  • Rudolph MJ; Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Bradenton, Florida.
  • Wong SF; University of Kentucky, Office of Strategic Planning & Institutional Effectiveness, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Zeeman JM; Chapman University, School of Pharmacy, Irvine, California.
  • Zeszotarski P; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 85(5): 8301, 2021 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34283729
ABSTRACT
Objective. To determine areas of concern, and challenges to implementing and assessing the co-curriculum in accredited Doctor of Pharmacy programs, along with how confident programs are in their ability to meet the co-curriculum requirement as mandated by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE).Methods. A survey was administered to all ACPE-accredited pharmacy programs to collect information regarding areas of concern, challenges, and confidence in their ability to meet the co-curriculum requirement. The frequency of responses to items are presented along with comparisons based on characteristics, including institution type, cohort size, most recent ACPE accreditation review, and supporting offices.Results. The most common concerns centered on the documentation and assessment process. The most commonly reported challenges were lack of enthusiasm or buy-in from faculty, staff, and students; lack of a clear definition of co-curriculum; and faculty time and insufficient staff. Overall, programs had a high level of confidence in their ability to meet the requirements for co-curriculum. The only differences found were related to supporting offices and cohort size.Conclusion. The results suggest that having supporting offices may reduce the co-curriculum burden. Similarly, student cohort size may have an impact on the challenges for some programs, particularly those with moderate-sized cohorts reporting challenges related to faculty and staff. Further research is needed to determine how programs address these critical issues, and to explore whether programs report differently on these areas after completing an accreditation review. The study results may be useful to members of the Academy when evaluating co-curriculum.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmácia / Estudantes de Farmácia / Educação em Farmácia Tipo de estudo: Sysrev_observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmácia / Estudantes de Farmácia / Educação em Farmácia Tipo de estudo: Sysrev_observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article