Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An Analysis of Frequency of Continuous Blood Pressure Variation and Haemodynamic Responses during Haemodialysis.
Latha Gullapudi, Venkata R; White, Kelly; Stewart, Jill; Stewart, Paul; Eldehni, Mohammed T; Taal, Maarten W; Selby, Nicholas M.
Afiliação
  • Latha Gullapudi VR; Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, Academic unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • White K; Sheffield Kidney Institute, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  • Stewart J; Renal Unit, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, United Kingdom.
  • Stewart P; School of Health and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.
  • Eldehni MT; School of Health and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, United Kingdom.
  • Taal MW; Renal Unit, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, United Kingdom.
  • Selby NM; Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, Academic unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Blood Purif ; 51(5): 435-449, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34293744
BACKGROUND: Higher beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP) variation during haemodialysis (HD) has been shown to be associated with elevated cardiac damage markers and white matter ischaemic changes in the brain suggesting relevance to end-organ perfusion. We aimed to characterize individual patterns of BP variation and associated haemodynamic responses to HD. METHODS: Fifty participants underwent continuous non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring during HD and BP variation were assessed using extrema point (EP) frequency analysis. Participants were divided into those with a greater proportion of low frequency (LF, n = 21) and high frequency (HF, n = 22) of BP variation. Clinical and haemodynamic data were compared between groups. RESULTS: Median EP frequencies for mean arterial pressure (MAP) of mid-week HD sessions were 0.54 Hz (interquartile range 0.18) and correlated with dialysis vintage (r = 0.32, p = 0.039), NT pro-BNP levels (r = 0.32, p = 0.038), and average real variability (ARV) of systolic BP (r = 0.33, p = 0.029), ARV of diastolic BP (r = 0.46, p = 0.002), and ARV of MAP (r = 0.57, p < 0.001). In the LF group, MAP positively correlated with cardiac power index (CPI) in each hour of dialysis, but not with total peripheral resistance index (TPRI). In contrast, in the HF group, MAP correlated with TPRI in each hour of dialysis but only with CPI in the first hour. CONCLUSIONS: EP frequency analysis of continuous BP monitoring during dialysis allows assessment of BP variation and categorization of individuals into low- or high-frequency groups, which were characterized by different haemodynamic responses to dialysis. This may assist in improved individualization of dialysis therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diálise Renal / Hipertensão Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diálise Renal / Hipertensão Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article