Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reconsidering the role of selective sodium channel blockers in genetic generalized epilepsy.
Cerulli Irelli, Emanuele; Morano, Alessandra; Fanella, Martina; Orlando, Biagio; Salamone, Enrico M; Giallonardo, Anna T; Di Bonaventura, Carlo.
Afiliação
  • Cerulli Irelli E; Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
  • Morano A; Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
  • Fanella M; Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
  • Orlando B; Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
  • Salamone EM; Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
  • Giallonardo AT; Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
  • Di Bonaventura C; Epilepsy Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 144(6): 647-654, 2021 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34314016
OBJECTIVE: Selective sodium channel blockers (SSCBs) have a limited use in genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE), due to their well-known risk of seizure worsening. Although their therapeutic potential in GGE has been suggested by recent evidence, electro-clinical data supporting their prescription are lacking. We aimed to investigate SSCB safety and effectiveness in a GGE cohort. METHODS: Subjects who received SSCBs and had ≥5-year follow-up were enrolled. Lamotrigine was excluded from analysis due to its broader pharmacodynamic spectrum and its better-documented efficacy in GGE. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (median follow-up 28.5 years) were included. The most used SSCB was carbamazepine in 40 subjects. At the last medical observation, only 9 subjects were still receiving SSCBs. The occurrence of generalized polyspike-wave discharges (GPSWDs) predicted reduced SSCB retention in Cox multivariate analysis. A seizure reduction ≥50% occurred in 53.5% (30/56) of subjects when considering all seizure types; however, the proportion of responders increased to 67.9% when considering only generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). GPSWDs were significantly associated with a reduced response rate, whereas GGE with GTCS only syndrome with a better outcome. The switch from SSCBs to antiseizure medications licensed for GGE improved seizure control in 65% of patients. Seizure worsening was reported in 5/56 patients; juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and a family history of epilepsy were significantly associated with seizure aggravation. CONCLUSION: SSCBs appeared effective on GTCS, but epilepsy aggravation and unsatisfactory control of other seizure types were not uncommon. Our study contributes to identifying new clinical and EEG variables associated with SSCB effectiveness and safety which may help neurologists in patients' management.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Epilepsia Generalizada / Epilepsia Mioclônica Juvenil Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Epilepsia Generalizada / Epilepsia Mioclônica Juvenil Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article