Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Impact of Hydrocephalus Shunt Devices on Quality of Life.
Mitchell, Kerry-Ann S; Zelko, Ian; Shay, Tamir; Horen, Sydney; Williams, Ally; Luciano, Mark; Huang, Judy; Brem, Henry; Gordon, Chad R.
Afiliação
  • Mitchell KS; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
  • Zelko I; Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Chicago, IL.
  • Shay T; Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva.
  • Horen S; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Williams A; Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva.
  • Luciano M; Section of Neuroplastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
  • Huang J; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Brem H; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Gordon CR; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(5): 1746-1750, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34319679
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite advances in hydrocephalus shunt technology and improvement in hydrocephalus management, many patients have chronic disability and require multiple surgeries throughout their lifetime. There is limited data from patients' perspective regarding the impact of shunt devices on quality-of-life.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional survey was developed to evaluate the impact of shunt devices on patient quality-of-life. The survey was distributed via social media platforms of the Hydrocephalus Association, and patients self-selected to anonymously complete the online questionnaire. A literature review was performed to contextualize the findings from the survey.

RESULTS:

A total of 562 survey responses were obtained from a network encompassing 35,000 members. The mean age was 30 years old (0.5-87), and 65% identified as female. Eighty one percent underwent at least 1 shunt revision surgery, with a reported average of 10 shunt revision surgeries per patient (1-200 surgeries). Occlusion, shunt migration and infection were the leading causes for revision at 60%, 47%, and 35%, respectively. In addition, 72% of patients reported pain and discomfort from the device, and 68% expressed avoidance of certain activities due to "fear of bumping shunt." Despite numerous articles discussing shunt technology, a review of the literature indicated a paucity of studies specifically evaluating the burden of shunt devices from a patient/caregiver perspective.

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings from this study suggest long-term physical and psychosocial burden associated with shunt devices. Importantly, this study highlights the need for concerted efforts to develop validated tools to study patient reported outcomes as it relates to neurocranial implanted devices.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Hidrocefalia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Hidrocefalia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article