Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100 on time in range: SWITCH PRO, a crossover study of basal insulin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes and risk factors for hypoglycaemia.
Goldenberg, Ronald M; Aroda, Vanita R; Billings, Liana K; Christiansen, A Sia Louise; Meller Donatsky, Anders; Parvaresh Rizi, Ehsan; Podgorski, Gracjan; Raslova, Katarina; Klonoff, David C; Bergenstal, Richard M.
Afiliação
  • Goldenberg RM; LMC Diabetes and Endocrinology, Concord, Ontario, Canada.
  • Aroda VR; Diabetes Clinical Research, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Hypertension, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Billings LK; Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem/University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Skokie, Illinois, USA.
  • Christiansen ASL; Biostatistics, Insulin & Devices, Novo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark.
  • Meller Donatsky A; Medical & Science, New Generation Insulins, Novo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark.
  • Parvaresh Rizi E; Global Medical Affairs, Novo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark.
  • Podgorski G; Internal Medicine, Greenacres Hospital, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
  • Raslova K; Metabolic Center Ltd, Bratislava, Slovakia.
  • Klonoff DC; Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA.
  • Bergenstal RM; International Diabetes Center and HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 23(11): 2572-2581, 2021 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34322967
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To compare time in range (TIR) with use of insulin degludec U100 (degludec) versus insulin glargine U100 (glargine U100) in people with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We conducted a randomized, crossover, multicentre trial comparing degludec and glargine U100 in basal insulin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes and ≥1 hypoglycaemia risk factor. There were two treatment periods, each with 16-week titration and 2-week maintenance phases (with evaluation of glucose using blinded professional continuous glucose monitoring). The once-weekly titration (target 3.9-5.0 mmol/L) was based on pre-breakfast self-measured blood glucose. The primary endpoint was percentage of TIR (3.9─10.0 mmol/L). Secondary endpoints included overall and nocturnal percentage of time in tight glycaemic range (3.9-7.8 mmol/L), and mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and glucose levels.

RESULTS:

At baseline, participants (n = 498) had a mean (SD) age of 62.8 (9.8) years, a diabetes duration of 15.1 (7.7) years and an HbA1c level of 59.6 (11.0) mmol/mol (7.6 [1.0]%). Noninferiority and superiority were confirmed for degludec versus glargine U100 for the primary endpoint, with a mean TIR of 72.1% for degludec versus 70.7% for glargine U100 (estimated treatment difference [ETD] 1.43% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12, 2.74; P = 0.03] or 20.6 min/d). Overall time in tight glycaemic range favoured degludec versus glargine U100 (ETD 1.5% [95% CI 0.15, 2.89] or 21.9 min/d). Degludec also reduced nocturnal time below range (TBR; <3.9 mmol/L) compared with glargine U100 (ETD -0.88% [95% CI -1.34, -0.42] or 12.7 min/night; post hoc) and significantly fewer nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes of <3.0 mmol/L were observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

Degludec, compared with glargine U100, provided more TIR and time in tight glycaemic range, and reduced nocturnal TBR in insulin-treated people with type 2 diabetes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Hipoglicemia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Hipoglicemia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article