Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Indication for Active Surveillance in the Era of MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsies.
Wetterauer, Christian; Federer-Gsponer, Joel R; Leboutte, Francois D J P; Mona, Robin; Ebbing, Jan; Rentsch, Cyrill A; Manka, Lukas; Seifert, Hans H; Wyler, Stephen; Recker, Franz; Kwiatkowski, Maciej.
Afiliação
  • Wetterauer C; Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Federer-Gsponer JR; Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Leboutte FDJP; Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Mona R; Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Ebbing J; Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Rentsch CA; Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Manka L; Department of Urology, Academic Hospital Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
  • Seifert HH; Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Wyler S; Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
  • Recker F; Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
  • Kwiatkowski M; Department of Urology, Academic Hospital Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Urol Int ; 106(1): 83-89, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34350895
INTRODUCTION: Active surveillance (AS) strategies were established to avoid overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Low tumor volume represents one indication criteria; however, applying this criterion after MRI-targeted prostate biopsies may lead to overestimation of tumor volume; wherefore, patients suitable for AS would be exposed to the risk of overtreatment. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 318 patients in which PCa was detected by MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy. Classic and extended indication for AS included Gleason 6 and Gleason 3 + 4 cancer, respectively. We assessed the effect of targeted biopsies and temporary rating strategies on eligibility for AS and developed new "composite" algorithms to more accurately assess eligibility for AS. RESULTS: Forty-four (13.8%) and 60 (18.9%) of the 318 patients qualified for AS according to "classic" and "extended" criteria, respectively. Application of the "composite 1" definition led to AS eligibility of 52 of 248 patients (20.97%) in the classic and of 77 of 248 patients (31.05%) in the "extended" group. CONCLUSIONS: We could demonstrate that classic algorithms led to ineligibility of patients for AS. We propose a new rating algorithm to improve tumor assessment for a more accurate indication for AS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista / Conduta Expectante / Biópsia Guiada por Imagem Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista / Conduta Expectante / Biópsia Guiada por Imagem Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article