Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bilateral total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review of clinical outcomes.
Smith, John-Rudolph H; Houck, Darby A; Hart, Jessica A; Bravman, Jonathan T; Frank, Rachel M; Vidal, Armando F; McCarty, Eric C.
Afiliação
  • Smith JH; Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Houck DA; Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Hart JA; Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Bravman JT; Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Frank RM; Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Vidal AF; The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
  • McCarty EC; Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Shoulder Elbow ; 13(4): 402-415, 2021 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34394738
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical outcomes following bilateral total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

METHODS:

A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases following PRISMA guidelines was performed. English-language literature published from 2010 to 2018 analyzing bilateral TSA (anatomic and/or reverse) with a minimum one-year follow-up was reviewed by two independent reviewers. Study quality was evaluated with the Modified Coleman Methodology Score and the methodological index for non-randomized studies score.

RESULTS:

Eleven studies (1 Level II, 3 Level III, 7 Level IV) with 292 patients were included. Two studies reported on bilateral anatomic TSA (n = 54), six reported on bilateral reverse TSA (RTSA; n = 168), two reported on anatomic TSA with contralateral RTSA (TSA/RTSA; n = 31), and one compared bilateral anatomic TSA (n = 26) and bilateral RTSA (n = 13). Among studies, mean revision rate ranged from 0% to 10.53% and mean complication rate ranged from 4.9% to 31.3%. At final follow-up, patients experienced significant overall improvements in range of motion and patient-reported outcome score measurements. However, bilateral anatomic TSA resulted in greater improvements in external rotation compared to bilateral RTSA. Overall patient satisfaction was 91.0%.

CONCLUSION:

The available data indicate that bilateral TSA allows for functional and pain improvements and result in high patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article