Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
No Difference Between Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Pathologic Femoral Neck Fractures.
Hayden, Brett L; Varady, Nathan H; Abdeen, Ayesha; Lozano-Calderon, Santiago A; Chen, Antonia F; Ready, John E.
Afiliação
  • Hayden BL; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Varady NH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Abdeen A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Lozano-Calderon SA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Chen AF; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Ready JE; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
J Arthroplasty ; 36(11): 3662-3666, 2021 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34419316
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been widely discussed as treatment options for displaced osteoporotic femoral neck fractures. Pathologic femoral neck fractures from primary or metastatic tumors are comparatively rare and poorly investigated. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes, complications, and perioperative survival for HA and THA in the treatment of pathologic femoral neck fractures of neoplastic etiology.

METHODS:

A multicenter retrospective cohort study identified patients with pathologic femoral neck fractures treated with HA or THA from 2005 to 2018. Demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Charlson comorbidity index, Dorr classification, histopathologic diagnosis, and surgical data were compared. The primary outcome was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality, estimated blood loss, length of stay, periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic joint infection, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

RESULTS:

There were 116 patients with HA and 48 patients with THA, with no differences between groups with regard to American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Charlson comorbidity index, or Dorr classification. There were no differences between HA and THA in the primary outcome of reoperation (5.2% vs 4.2%, P = 1.00) or secondary outcomes of perioperative 90-day overall mortality (30.2% vs 25.0%, P = .51), estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, length of stay, discharge location, periprosthetic joint infection, periprosthetic fracture, or preoperative or postoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both HA and THA are viable options for the treatment of patients with pathologic femoral neck fractures and demonstrated no differences in reoperations, complications, perioperative 90-day mortality, or functional outcome scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Fraturas do Colo Femoral / Hemiartroplastia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Fraturas do Colo Femoral / Hemiartroplastia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article