Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The response of streams in the Adirondack region of New York to projected changes in sulfur and nitrogen deposition under changing climate.
Shao, Shuai; Burns, Douglas A; Shen, Huizhong; Chen, Yilin; Russell, Armistead G; Driscoll, Charles T.
Afiliação
  • Shao S; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, 151 Link Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. Electronic address: sshao@syr.edu.
  • Burns DA; U.S. Geological Survey New York Water Science Center, 425 Jordan Road, Troy, NY 12180, USA.
  • Shen H; School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
  • Chen Y; School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
  • Russell AG; School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
  • Driscoll CT; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, 151 Link Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.
Sci Total Environ ; 800: 149626, 2021 Dec 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34426327
Modeling studies project that in the future surface waters in the northeast US will continue to recover from acidification over decades following reductions in atmospheric sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emissions. However, these studies generally assume stationary climatic conditions over the simulation period and ignore the linkages between soil and surface water recovery from acid deposition and changing climate, despite fundamental impacts to watershed processes and comparable time scales for both phenomena. In this study, the integrated biogeochemical model PnET-BGC was applied to two montane forest watersheds in the Adirondack region of New York, USA to evaluate the recovery of surface waters from historical acidification in response to possible future changes in climate and atmospheric sulfur and nitrogen deposition. Statistically downscaled climate scenarios on average project warmer temperatures and greater precipitation for the Adirondack by the end of the century. Model simulations suggest under constant climate, acid-sensitive Buck Creek would gain 12.8 µeq L-1 of acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) by 2100 from large reductions in deposition, whereas acid insensitive Archer Creek is projected to gain 7.9 µeq L-1 of ANC. However, climate change could limit those improvements in acid-base status. Under climate change, a negative offset relative to the ANC increases with no climate change are projected for both streams by 2100. In acid-insensitive Archer Creek the negative offset (-8.5 µeq L-1) was large enough that ANC is projected to decrease by -0.6 µeq L-1, whereas in acid-sensitive Buck Creek, the negative offset (-0.4 µeq L-1) resulted in a slight decline of the projected future ANC increase to 12.4 µeq L-1. Calculated target loads for 2150 for both sites decreased when future climate change was considered in model simulations, which suggests further reductions in acid deposition may be necessary to restore ecosystem structure and function under a changing climate.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Chuva Ácida / Rios Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Chuva Ácida / Rios Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article