Convergent Validity of a Novel Clinical Reasoning Tool in Clerkship Medical Students: Pilot Study.
Med Sci Educ
; 30(1): 61-64, 2020 Mar.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34457638
ABSTRACT
Medical student educators have limited tools for standardized clinical reasoning assessment. The clinical reasoning task (CRT) checklist has been shown to identify specific tasks in the diagnostic process among residents and faculty. Authors assessed a novel student think aloud protocol strategy, the CRT, compared with the validated clinical data interpretation (CDI) test in six third-year medical students. The CRT was scored by two independent reviewers (kappa = 0.88). CRT and CDI scores were strongly positively correlated (r = 0.768, p = 0.074, df = 4). CRT provides both a global assessment of clinical reasoning and specific clinical reasoning deficits.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudo:
Guideline
/
Prognostic_studies
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2020
Tipo de documento:
Article