Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tranexamic acid for prevention of bleeding in cesarean delivery: An overview of systematic reviews.
Hurskainen, Tomi; Deng, Mimi X; Etherington, Cole; Burns, Joseph K; Martin Calderon, Leonardo; Moher, David; Edwards, Wesley; Boet, Sylvain.
Afiliação
  • Hurskainen T; Department of Anesthesiology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Deng MX; Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Etherington C; School of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Burns JK; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute - Centre for Practice Changing Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Martin Calderon L; Clinical Research Assistant, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Moher D; School of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Edwards W; Knowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Boet S; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 66(1): 3-16, 2022 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34514595
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Bleeding is the leading cause of maternal mortality in the world. Tranexamic acid reduces bleeding in trauma and surgery. Several systematic reviews of randomized trials have investigated tranexamic acid in the prevention of bleeding in cesarean delivery. However, the conclusions from systematic reviews are conflicting. This overview aims to summarize the evidence and explore the reasons for conflicting conclusions across the systematic reviews.

METHODS:

A comprehensive literature search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted from inception to April 2021. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were performed by two independent reviewers. A Measurement Tool to Assess Reviews 2 and the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews were used for study appraisal. A qualitative synthesis of evidence is presented.

RESULTS:

In all, 14 systematic reviews were included in our analysis. Across these reviews, there were 32 relevant randomized trials. A modest reduction in blood transfusions and bleeding outcomes was found by most systematic reviews. Overall confidence in results varied from low to critically low. All of the included systematic reviews were at high risk of bias. Quality of evidence from randomized trials was uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS:

Systematic reviews investigating prophylactic tranexamic acid in cesarean delivery are heterogeneous in terms of methodological and reporting quality. Tranexamic acid may reduce blood transfusion and bleeding outcomes, but rigorous well-designed research is needed due to the limitations of the included studies. Data on safety and adverse effects are insufficient to draw conclusions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ácido Tranexâmico / Antifibrinolíticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Overview / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ácido Tranexâmico / Antifibrinolíticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Overview / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article